Charles C. Johnson (the one with the 158 I.Q.)

User avatar
Sterngard Friegen
Posts: 41573
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Trump International - Malibu

Re: Charles C. Johnson (the one with the 158 I.Q.)

#51

Post by Sterngard Friegen » Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:58 pm

Mikedunford wrote:
Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:39 pm
:oops: I forgot about Pruneyard.

Interestingly, and perhaps relevantly, the Twitter ToS contains a governing law clause that specifies California law. That's potentially good news for Johnson (although I'm unconvinced that Pruneyard is sufficiently on-point).

On the bad news front for Johnson, the ToS also contains a forum clause. And it ain't Fresno.
Choice of forum clauses are somewhat problematic in California.



User avatar
bob
Posts: 22565
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: Charles C. Johnson (the one with the 158 I.Q.)

#52

Post by bob » Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:51 am

NMgirl wrote:
Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:57 pm
Is there some reason that Johnson can't simply move his lawsuit to San Francisco County?
No, but Twitter will probably "aid" him.


Imagex4 Imagex2 Imagex2 Imagex2

Post Reply

Return to “Other Fringe Groups & Individuals”