To me, this is the most obvious point nobody has mentioned: March 1 is NOT FEBRUARY.

To me, this is the most obvious point nobody has mentioned: March 1 is NOT FEBRUARY.

So Arpaio has already failed to live up to his promises, and is only "scheduling" a "news conference" to provide cover for the slip.

To me, this is the most obvious point nobody has mentioned: March 1 is NOT FEBRUARY.

So Arpaio has already failed to live up to his promises, and is only "scheduling" a "news conference" to provide cover for the slip.

It's February 30 on my calendar, Verbie. (And March 2 is actually February 31.)

To be fair, what WND originally reported was "Arpaio said a comprehensive report will be issued shortly after the February preliminary report."

It was only a "preliminary" report that was scheduled for February, although they never quite explained what thedistinction would be.

At first it’s February and now it’s March….I seriously doubt that we will ever see this report and if we do it will have all of the “never before known” goodies omitted from it….It’ll be a rehash of what we already know, just like Corsi’s book was a big disappointment…..Whatever damning evidence that has been uncovered will be used as a bargaining chip in the sheriff’s office battle with the feds….”Lets make a deal!”

It's February 30 on my calendar, Verbie. (And March 2 is actually February 31.)

As most people are likely aware, during a law enforcement investigation, those who are conducting it cannot reveal any of the evidence they are examining, as doing so can often hamper the investigation itself. However, there has been a concerted effort by someone playing the role of an attorney (very poorly, I might add) to either hijack or sabotage this investigation, as was evidenced by her mailing an unenforceable, downloaded “subpoena” form from Georgia's OSAH website. This was an attempt to “force” Sheriff Joe into prematurely revealing the products of his investigation, which, thankfully, was seen as the ignoble and ignorable act that it was. It was an attempted hijacking.

[...]

Before proceeding, I want to explain something important, as this is crucial to understanding what is repeatedly happening to our initiatives. Orly Taitz seems to display a need to attach herself to every possible aspect of our movement in a tireless effort to remain the self-exalted face of it. When she is hampered in her quests to hijack what others are trying to accomplish (to try to claim their efforts as her own), she will inevitably do all she can to sabotage them.

[...]

On October 25, 2011, there was a joint meeting of the Sun City West, AZ and Surprise, AZ Tea Parties at which there was a presentation scheduled by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. While I am told there was great vigilance in making sure the presentation did not get hijacked, those involved in that lookout detail were informed shortly before the meeting that Orly Taitz was flying in, and had arranged for her own videographer. Obviously, someone within the organization had leaked the information, and what ensued, once Sheriff Joe opened the door to questions from the audience, was an obvious attempt at the aforementioned hijacking.

[...]

Additionally, sources close to the investigation are aware of rumors regarding possible attempts to turn the press conference into a “dog and pony show” with signs, demonstrators, and even banners flown by airplanes. As this press conference will reveal the preliminary results of a professional law enforcement investigation, such activity would be highly inappropriate, and could potentially cause the media to trivialize the entire process. It is requested that we respect the importance of this event, and refrain from any attempts to marginalize it with those kinds of activities.

Additionally, sources close to the investigation are aware of rumors regarding possible attempts to turn the press conference into a “dog and pony show” with signs, demonstrators, and even banners flown by airplanes. As this press conference will reveal the preliminary results of a professional law enforcement investigation, such activity would be highly inappropriate, and could potentially cause the media to trivialize the entire process. It is requested that we respect the importance of this event, and refrain from any attempts to marginalize it with those kinds of activities.

Deano:
Oh. You mean like videoing yourself traversing Oahu or demonstrating on Honolulu sidewalks with life-size cut-outs of the President and giant-sized checks, and such?

Imagine you have "shocking" evidence and expert witnesses who can testify to fraud, forgery, identity theft, bribery, extortion,etc. against Obama and others who conspired to aid him in usurping the office of president. Do you hold a big public event to release your investigative findings? No. Do you hold a small, exclusive press event to announce what your group of detectives have discovered? No. Do you answer questions about how the investigation is going even from those who asked you to undertake it? No. If you have anything substantial which could be used to bring criminal charges, you turn it over to prosecutors.

To do anything else would divulge evidence sources, endanger potential witnesses along with your case, open yourself and your investigation to ridicule (not to mention the misinterpretations and disinformation which usually accompany the grandstanding, zealously competitive efforts of those who believe THEY are the most important figures challenging the eligibility or criminal deceptions of Obama/Soetoro/whatever)...giving it more of a circus environment rather than a credible law enforcement investigation. Unless the big announcement is that there is no big announcement.....should there be one at all?

I believe that Obama is a treasonous fraud and I hope that this investigation reveals at least some of what he has paid so much to hide. But in all honesty, is this how anyone would or should proceed if they have evidence of wrongdoing? I don't think so.

ORYR comment:

...your rational argument weakens me....

As this press conference will reveal the preliminary results of a professional law enforcement investigation ...

Initially, it was planned to hold the press conference in a facility that could accommodate a very large group of those interested in witnessing it firsthand. However, it has recently been decided to hold the press conference in a much smaller venue, and to allow entrance to the event by invitation only. Based on what I have shared with you, I'll just let you do the math on that one.

Deano sez:



Hold the phone. This is only going to be preliminary results?? Jerome promised us that this was the real thing.

Oh, and did you catch this:



Sounds like it's just a case of basic subtraction.

I guess he wants to limit the people who are going to scream "Traitor!" when he releases his "shocking" results.

..... hmmm I was hoping for the Ides of March... but the sooner the better I guess....Celebrate with Blazing Saddles Campfire Baked Beans. Let'er Rip Joe !!!!!!