Comment at ORYR to Zebest's tripe

ORYR has some of the fiercest keyboard warriors on the internet, but they are always too busy to attend any of the real-life gatherings that require them to get off the couch.

By "Sheriff" do they mean Arpaio? Sheet, he bristled at the question of why he didn't try to stop the President and ask for his papers when the President was in AZ, do they really think that coward's going to go to DC with seditionists?

Do we have a smilie tipping the place where one would expect the residence of some brain cells

Carl Swensson mentioned a few weeks back that once the sheriffs are all together, then the "law enforcement arm" would be "in place." And the real revolutionaries will be able to move forth and usurp the usurpererer.

ORYR comment:

The audio is posted at ORYR

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot ... bamas.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3PDUPD6 ... r_embedded

He starts out as though it is a settled issue, but then goes birther before the 2 minutes is done.

I agree it's not a racist dog-whistle.

However, my 'moron' comment was more aimed at the sloppy use of language. I know all about RGB and the rest -- and on reflection I think you've accurately divined what she was getting at -- but black is black. There is no 'range of black.' Thus there is no 'pure range of black.' She really meant 'pure range of gray', if anything. Picky, I know.

More to the point, she is challenging someone to come up with a Quartz-generated PDF that exhibits -- via automated optimization -- the exact characteristics of the Obama online LFBC. She seems pretty confident that it won't be accomplished. But isn't it curious that she doesn't also issue a similar challenge to come up with a completely manually constructed PDF that exhibits the same characteristics?

Start with the elements that a forger might have: A clean background of security paper, individual scanned elements of signatures, stamps, and seals and the like, a scan of all the letters typed out by a period typewriter, a scan of an original 1961 LFBC form... now combine them on layers in Photoshop, and create exactly the same result as the online LFBC: signatures split apart so as to appear on different layers, typographic elements fractured onto different layers, etc., and it has to be high-resolution enough to produce the AP version, but also exhibit the exact pixellation and haloing as the LFBC, the same 24/48% scaling, the same rotation of the original elements, and -- this is key -- no other characteristics.

I'm not entirely sure it's possible at all, but if it is, it would take many hours more -- or extraordinary Photoshop expertise -- to arrive at that result, for no earthly reason. You'd have someone who'd have done maybe 10-, 20-times the amount of work necessary -- why? To put parts of Ann Dunham's signature on two different layers, merging part of it with some typographic elements from another source, and some linear form elements from yet a third source? And then 'knocking out' the background security paper completely unnecessarily, and carefully scaling each part so as to mimic the automated optimization of Quartz? And then editing the exif data?

Pretty soon -- goalpost alert! -- the birthers will be claiming NOT that the forger was a bumbling moron who forgot to flatten the image, but rather that he was a top virtuoso image expert, highly schooled in rare and arcane secret NSA methods of manually creating PDFs that flawlessly pretend to be the result of optimized scans.....

If it is a cheezy forgery then we need to make sure the secret document section of FEMA gets more training.

Then he deserves all the hounding he's about to receive from birfers.

Hilarious, Steve King.

Birthers, you should all call him. Keep calling.



And it was Tracy who called him? I would guess it was ObamaKenyaTracy?

This person on The Birther Report responds to Fred Thompson on his comments re NBC, and they wonder why they remain in moderation.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/atty-mario-apuzzo-responds-to-fred.html
This in response to a piece of verbiage by Mario.
Regards ...........Dick

I'm stunned Failio had time to "respond" to Fred, considering how wrapped up and pathetic he is over at the Terry Lakin book review thread......

To be fair, he just mostly copy-pasted his own well-composted manure.

Probably could go under Sammy the Sewer's Steady Drip thread also too, but...

From ORYR,

Because it was obviously so successful in FL.

“Do It Yourself Obama Ballot Challenge Opens Another Case in Kentucky”
Sam Sewell @ The Steady Drip

PRESS RELEASE...



Yet another "presidential candidate" who needs help with filing fees?

Cliff Notes version: We're filing another loser case so send us your money.

Didn't Dr. House have a TV show?

ORYR: Myth Busted: Zip Code Clerical Error Caused Obama To Be Issued CT Social Security Number

... and, of course, anyone working at the Social Security office would immediately recognize that the 06814 zip code was ONLY for Union Carbide addresses and thus wouldn't dream of mistyping or miscoding the number while working through the small handful of data entry items they'd been given that day. Plus, you *know* that the Social Security office and the Post Office are so closely aligned that the Social Security system would spit out as "invalid" any entry with a zip code that wasn't "in circulation." Not to mention that the Post Office is simply incapable of delivering any mail with an incorrect zip code, right?



Talk about a weak argument! How does the zip code being used only for Union Carbide and being out of circulation for years make it impossible for the Social Security Administration's data entry operator to make a typo or misread the card and entered the wrong number? How does it prevent the Social Security office from issuing a number based on the info? Somehow I don't think the SSA cross-checks new applications or cards being sent out against post office lists of zip codes. And I know I've received mail sent to me with wildly incorrect zip codes before. My grandmother used to send me a monthly allowance while I was in college - it always took a few extra days to get to me because she somehow had gotten my zip code written in her address book as one that should have been in Florida instead of the midwest, and I could never get her to correct it. So the check always got routed to Florida and then sent back to me. This was in the early 80's, so I don't think it's a stretch to say that something similar could VERY EASILY have happened with Obama's Social Security card.

Again:

Her willful ignorance of the Social Security System is only exceeded by her ignorance of the law.

The idiot even contradicts herself when it comes to when PBO's SS# was issued in 1977 and then pretends it was never used until 1986 yet we know he used it for his registration for the draft in 1980. Then there is the fact that he was working at Baskin-Robbins in or around 1977.

This nonsense is never going to end. It will be spoken about when he leaves office in 2017 until the day he dies because these nutjobs live for this conspiracy crap.

I know if I had a birth certificate that everyone had always considered legitimate, for example when I went to school and got a driver's license, I would definitely go to the extra trouble of obtaining a fraudulent Social Security number because it would be so much more fun than getting one by filing the same easy application everyone else uses requiring my birth certificate (the authenticity of which has never been questioned). Have birthers ever suggested why the president would need to go that route when he had used a birth certificate his whole life from Hawaii that had always passed muster, including for getting a U.S. passport and transferring custody to his grandparents?

Was he supposedly just afraid that the people at the Social Security Administration would be the first and only ones until the idiot birthers came along that were sharp enough to detect a fake birth certificate? And just how did he go about doing this at age 16? Are they claiming he did so willfully and independently? Because in addition to proving he had an alleged fraudulent number, they would have to prove that he knew that was the case. If he had always been told he was born in Hawaii (which he would have been, since he was) , he would not even know his birth certificate was fake (which it isn't). And since it is highly unlikely a 16-year-old goes about securing a Soc. Security number (fake or real, but especially fake) on his own, someone would have had to do it for him. Given that he would have been a minor when he signed any fake application (would you even sign a form to get a fraudulent number?) as requested by whatever adult was getting the card, he would not be legally responsible for getting that number -- the adult guardian would.

My father got my card for me, and I have always assumed it and my birth certificate are legit. No one has given me cause to think otherwise. And in court, all the president would have to say is that he never had any reason to think his social security card was not legitimate or that he was not born in Hawaii, and no one would be able to prove otherwise.

It is not enough to prove the number is fraudulent. They would have to prove that as an adult he was knowingly using a fraudulent number given to him as a juvenile by a guardian who told him it was not genuine. Good luck with that. They certainly would not be able to find a way for him to be held legally accountable for whatever adults would have done to get him the number without his awareness of it not being legitimate.

Never mind the additional fact that it is irrelevant.

Occam's Razor tells us that Orly Taitz and Susan Daniels (among others) are complete lunatics.

I know. It is a waste of time to try to understand the thought process of a birther. It's like trying to understand a book with all the odd pages torn out erased. You can understand the words being said and get the gist of the narrative but it lacks any sort of cohesive progression and has some big gaping holes between events.