Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1339 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 54  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 3110
Location: LA,CA
Occupation: Game designer and code monkey
shrek wrote:
It would also be interesting to hear Mikedunford's take on just how much of Obly's incompetent faffing about was edited out.

I just watched part of #3 (trying to avoid his editorializing), and I did notice a dissolve cut where he took something out. Nonetheless, very amusing and typical Orly -- she doesn't seem to hear anything the court says, does she?

_________________
Ducktape

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear And disregards the rest." Paul Simon, The Boxer
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
It is all crystal clear at the very end of part 4, however. The court asks Orly a very specific question regarding her next step and Orly responds that she will take that very specific step.

Before leaving Hawaii, Orly filed more documents. She's golden. Any. Day. Now.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3516
Jeff LaFraud (who is clearly heir apparent to both Ed Murrow and Ken Burns), really has done we the people an immense service. If only the mainstream media had journalists who fight the good fight like him, we the people would have the America we the people want, and we the people could get rid of the black guy calling himself 'president.'

:mrgreen:

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3371
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
ducktape wrote:
shrek wrote:
It would also be interesting to hear Mikedunford's take on just how much of Obly's incompetent faffing about was edited out.

I just watched part of #3 (trying to avoid his editorializing), and I did notice a dissolve cut where he took something out. Nonetheless, very amusing and typical Orly -- she doesn't seem to hear anything the court says, does she?


I don't think anything substantive was omitted. (Granted, a reasonable argument can be made that nothing substantive occurred during the hearing period, but you get my point.) The clips do reflect less stuttering, stammering, umming, and ahhing than I recall. We have to wait on the transcript to check the rest.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:19 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
Yet another brilliant idea from a commenter at ORYR... shades of Chalice. :P

Quote:
Anonymous said...[Reply]

Enough with court challenges. Congress is hopeless as well. The obama birth cert is irrelevant. We can't get any judge or congress critters to investigate his fraudulent bc anyway!

We should work on the presidential candidates!
Write to them en masse. Or ask them in person, these simple questions -
"
1. Are you an article 2 natural born citizen of USA?
1. If your answer is yes,
a. were you born in USA? What supporting (physical, not digital image) document do you have?
2. Are both your parents USA citizens at time of your birth? Any hard-copy documentary proofs?

Please reply. We will assume that you are not a natural born citizen if you do not reply.
These are perfectly legitimate questions to ensure you meet the constitutional requirement for the USA presidency. "

When we have accumulated the replies, we will bring them to the candidates to demand that they ask their contender obama the same questions.
They have to asnwer these questions, why not obama? They have to meet the nbc constitutional requirement, why not obama?

Chris

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9197
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
ORYR comment:
Quote:
The supposed "Real Lawyer" says:
Quote:
Familiarity with the law, the rules of procedure, the rules of evidence AND the law being favorable to your argument are what's required. Unfortunately,

This statement proves you are NOT a real lawyer. If you were than you would know that knowing the judge is what is important. I have been involved in the legal process and my family knows judges and believe me I know that knowing the judge is the way to sin a case.

You have shown you are as much of a phony as Obama-Soetoro-Bunnell-on and on and on.

If that were true, why hasn't OPOVV been "getting to know" some judges these past three years?

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 3110
Location: LA,CA
Occupation: Game designer and code monkey
=)) =)) =))
Well, I do believe that's their problem.

I mean, look at Orly -- she's spent a lot of time getting to know judge Lamberth and Judge Guilford. And Judge Nishimura, too.

Think that's helped her? Or would she have better spent her time learning the law?

Stay tuned for the next episode.

_________________
Ducktape

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear And disregards the rest." Paul Simon, The Boxer
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6417
Location: Edmonds, WA
Looks like Thomas MacLeran, aka "OPOVV", is a mite cranky.

Quote:
OPOVV said…[Reply]
@A Real Lawyer
All you Obots are obviously very nervous about what Orly is doing with the ballot challenges. You know that with 50 states one may actually look at the evidence and then it is all over for you Marxists.

If you actually think she has no chance, because your boy has threatened everyone who would even consider looking into the issue then you wouldn't be posting on here.

Believe me the truth is going to come out and everyone involved, this includes all Obots, will be tried and swinging from a tree. That is the penalty for treason, which I am sure you know since you are a "real lawyer".
December 5, 2011 2:03 PM


Someone had fun with him though.

Quote:
"Anonymous said…[Reply]
OPOVV: (Thomas Macleran) … I live here in TN and as a black man, I don't take too kindly to some confederate redneck like you threatening to have me lynched for supporting the president. I know the bars where your wife pretends to be a country singer and would gladly go toe to toe with you any day of the week. You'd better be careful, Tommy Boy, You might end up bit by hogs before you know it.
December 5, 2011 2:35 PM"


Poor Thomas. Maybe he just needs his wife to sing him sweetly to sleep....


_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18609
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
I still wonder about her. seriously, go to the very end of that video. Are Thomas and Fran one and the same? :-?

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
Don't let the mustache fool you.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18609
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Image

mebbe Fran is Nathan Lane then? :-?

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9402
mimi wrote:
Image

mebbe Fran is Nathan Lane then? :-?


Nathan Lane looks better in drag than Fran in whatever she is in, and can actually sing.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
Comment at ORYR,

Quote:
I Tell it Like it is said...[Reply]

One of the main Anonymous (Obot) trolls on this site is FOGBOW.

FOGBOW (aka Justin Shilo) :P has a lot in common with the Obama's. FOGBOW and Michelle Obama and Barack Obama have surrendered/lost their law license. =)) At least one due to unethical behavior. Being that all three have no ethics I would be surprised if more than one lost it due to unethcal behavior.

Also, just as Obama-Soetoro-Burnell doesn't use his real name neither does Justin Shilo (aka FOGBOW).

In addition, neither Michelle Obama, Barack Obama or FOGBOW have fact on their side so they resort to character assassination.

For this reason I would suggest you ignore his idiotic, non-factual comments.

What a great suggestion... ignore "I Tell it like it is said"'s non-factual information.

What a moron. =))
December 11, 2011 10:40 AM

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12902
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
:shock:

At least they don't know about Rhoda yet ... :-$

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3940
Location: Switzerland
realist wrote:
Comment at ORYR,

Quote:
I Tell it Like it is said..


Fogblow!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
RTH10260 wrote:
realist wrote:
Comment at ORYR,

Quote:
I Tell it Like it is said..


Fogblow!


:lol:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:15 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
Comment from ORYR.

The discussion is in the Trump article from Trump asking the stupid question why are there no hospital records for Obama's mother. Someone asked are there any hospital records for Trumps mother.

RS, the genius, responds...

Quote:
RS said...[Reply]

@Anonymous

Anon OBot - Are there hospital records for Trump's mother?

"Perhaps you didn't understand the question. Let me rephrase.

Are there hospital records for Trump's mother? M-O-T-H-E-R.



Perhaps you didn't read the NY Jamaica hospital birth certificate nimrod.

It says, "This certifies that Donald John Trump was born to Mr & M-R-S Fred C. Trump in this hospital...."

MRS = mother...unless you OBots know of a way that a child can be born without a mother back in 1946? LoL -Donald Trump's hospital birth certificate nimrod also doubles as a record for his mother.

So OBot, I suppose your lame point was to be that since Trump didn't show his mother's hospital records when he was born like Obama not showing Stanley Ann Dunham-Obama's hospital records makes the "Birther" argument hollow and moot. LoL. If I had a dollar every time I slapped down an Obot for lack of critical thinking, I'd be rich as Trump. LoL.
December 10, 2011 12:02 AM


=))

I mean, really, can people actually walk and breathe at the same time and be this stupid? -xx

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 1135
Location: not Florida, just a bit east of there....
Occupation: Huntin' Freepers
So, both of Trump's parents were named Fred C. Trump?

;)

_________________
We are all Americans, with the same rights and the same duties, regardless our ethnical background. - The Gospel According To Wilfred Noonan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:13 pm
Posts: 1941
Location: Unfortunately, deep in the Bible Belt
All I can say is folks like RS have a strange definition of "critical thinking." Of course, the same came be said of the words logic, facts, evidence ....

_________________
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 11004
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Adrianinflorida wrote:
So, both of Trump's parents were named Fred C. Trump?

;)


What is worse, both were actually named Fred C. Drumph.
Ohh, you stepped in Drumph, clean your shoes! The Lysol is over there.

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
So how come they can't remove Obama? :lol:

The nutjobs seem to think there's some hypocrisy here...

From ORYR.

State Supreme Court deciding if politician 'ineligible' for office
Ruling to determine whether elected secretary of state properly registered

Bob Unruh


Quote:
A ruling awaited from the Indiana Supreme Court is expected to determine whether Secretary of State Charlie White will remain in office after a lower court decided he was ineligible at the time he was elected.

Marion County Circuit Court Judge Louis Rosenberg previously ruled White was ineligible to be on the 2010 ballot and Democrat runner-up, Vop Osili, should be declared the winner.

The case was moved up to the state Supreme Court today, and its eventual ruling is expected to gather much attention. While the specific situation is different, the issue of removing an elected official from office over eligibility has been dogging Barack Obama since before his inauguration in 2009.

[...]

The controversy began when Democrats alleged before the 2010 election that White was guilty of voter fraud by voting in a precinct where he didn't live. While White won the election by hundreds of thousands of votes, Democrats continued to insist he never was registered correctly.

[...]

"The fact that Mr. White knowingly registered in the wrong precinct is sufficient to render him ineligible for the office of secretary of state," he ruled.


much more at WND... http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=380641

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9197
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Quote:

ORYR comment:
bn wrote:
I've got a new suspicion...Newt Gingrich was recently disqualified in Virginia to be on the ballot in the primaries. I see where a Democrat lawyer is taking up his case, "so that Virginians are not denied the choice". How much you wanna bet that Newt is re-instated and that that episode is used to make the case for BHO to be on any state ballot that challenges his qualifications. That's how the power brokers, masters of manipulating the public play the game.

So if a democrat challenges an ineligible republican candidate, that's being hypocritical.

And if a democrat assists an ineligible republican candidate, that's manipulating the public.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:52 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
The resident "legal expert" at ORYR (and other places around the net over time) lays it all out. :lol:

In response to another poster's query he sez:

Quote:
RS said...[Reply]

@Anonymous

Have you read what the Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana said about Minor v. Happersett?


Give it up OBot. I don't recall those clowns every mentioning Minor v. Happersett. Ankeny has been taken apart so many times that it is a joke.

Have you read what Northern California District Court Justice Morrow said about the Minor opinion in the Wong Kim Ark case?

No, but I have read the 1898 US v. Wong Kim Ark backwards and forwards from front to end. There is no mention of Justice Gray ever stating Wong Ark was ever a natural born citizen OBum.

Gray blabbed ad nauseam of natural born SUBject to the British crown in the British empire, which is NOT the same as an being an NBC. He put a square peg in a round hole making Wong Kim Ark a US citizen.

So Foggy-nut are you a "SUBject" sport? LoL. Do you owe fealty to a king or vassal somewhere? So FoggyBot, you are a feudal tenant showing your fidelity to your lord Obama. So you like being a natural SUB-ject for OBama. As in being ...

"The latin Prefix 'Sub' can mean 'under', 'beneath', or 'below' (such as in the Word 'Subconscious'), 'inferior to', or 'part of' (such as in the Word 'Subhuman'), ..." Get BOwing to OBama LoL.

Being a natural born SUBject is being SUBservant to royalty. The rest us will be US citizens and US natural born citizens.

Also have you read Justice Fuller's dissenting opinion in Wong Kim Ark? He also mentions Minor v. Hapersett. And he also mentions the definition of "natural born Citizen. But not at the same time.

Yes Village OBot I read the dissent too. Yeah, Wong Ark was NOT an NBC let alone a US citizen.

And quit spamming ORYR with your dumb nonsense.


[bolding original - highlighting and coloring mine]

I've seen RS say many, many really stupid things, but this post of his may just take the prize for his ultimate stupidity.

So now Wong Kim Ark is not even a citizen. =)) ](*,)

What an absolute moron.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4409
Location: between the candle and the star
realist wrote:
some idiot trying to tell realist he's wrong wrote:
"The latin Prefix 'Sub' can mean 'under', 'beneath', or 'below' (such as in the Word 'Subconscious'), 'inferior to', or 'part of' (such as in the Word 'Subhuman'), ..." Get BOwing to OBama LoL.

Being a natural born SUBject is being SUBservant to royalty. The rest us will be US citizens and US natural born citizens.


I wonder if he's aware that a recent examination of the Constitution showed that in at least one place where the matter of citizenship was mentioned, they found that Jefferson had originally written "subject" and then had to try and scratch the ink off the parchment to replace it with the word "citizen?" I think that says a lot about just how closely related those two terms are in the minds of the Founding Fathers.

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:35 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23590
realist wrote:
some idiot trying to tell realist he's wrong wrote:
"The latin Prefix 'Sub' can mean 'under', 'beneath', or 'below' (such as in the Word 'Subconscious'), 'inferior to', or 'part of' (such as in the Word 'Subhuman'), ..." Get BOwing to OBama LoL.

Being a natural born SUBject is being SUBservant to royalty. The rest us will be US citizens and US natural born citizens.


realist, nor any sockpuppet thereof, was not the poster RS was responding to. I don't even remember who the poster was, if it was one of the many "anonymous" posters or what, but it was not realist.

Some idiot over there seems to think Justin is posting there... highly doubtful.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1339 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 54  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group