Right on cue Phil posts this bullshit lifted from Orly's site: (More proof he has no integrity left.)
Quote:
Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Claim
Submitted by Phil on Mon, Apr 20, 2009No Comment
Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Claim
Yup, this one is a claim with absolutely no evidence to support it, but it is apparently beginning to make the rounds (and you knew someone was going to get this one started).
From Repubx.com (via CitizenWells):
Hat-tip to Probie who gives this information:
Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only reason they haven’t rolled out the foregery yet is that it is “seasoning” under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready….one to two months tops.
I also said they’d have to get a 1960s Printing Press, and indeed, by this information, looks like they found one.
The banking connection is disturbing too, gives more credibility to this also. The details here are solid.
Frankly, those “details [that] are solid” are about as reliable as a wet paper bag at this point. However, the CitizenWells link provides reliable data regarding individuals connected to the Administration that are skilled at potential forgeries (hence why such a rumor is not completely out of the question).
So, why am I covering a completely unsubstantiated rumor? For the simple fact that many “illegitimizers” would attempt to use this ruse as a scapegoat of an opinion against those of us who question this President’s eligibility if/when an original birth certificate is produced.
Since we already know that the online certification of live birth is effectively irrelevant for any authority to substantiate the President’s eligibility (notice also that no authority with the power to do so has either used nor mentioned this piece of paper as being legitimate to substantiate authority), the point is to know that whatever document may ever come to the fore is legitimate. And this is why it’s incredibly important that should there ever come a time when this President’s background documentation is ever analyzed, a competent forensics examiner is available to substantiate said documentation.
Then again, let’s suppose that the above rumor is true; what does that tell us? Simply that the eligibility question truly has been an issue all along and the President knows it, and we should therefore exercise every resource at our disposal to discover the truth.