Politicians playing 'the God card' on oil, energy, and carbon caps
May 14, 2:26 PMConservative ExaminerAnthony G. Martin

# RT @NMJune: @welshman007 I also forwarded it to Glenn Beck. ll Thank you very much! about 3 hours ago via TweetDeck

Folks, my new series I started today at Examiner is NOT 'old news.' This has NOT been reported, at least not the players. More info 2 come about 3 hours ago via TweetDeck

Think again. An entire secret network has been uncovered by this investigation that shows conclusively that your government is preparing to override any rights guaranteed to be protected by the Constitution, including your right to privacy concerning your medical records, your investments, your bank accounts, your insurance, as well as your right to free speech, due process, gun rights, and every other liberty specifically designated by the Constitution as 'God-given' and 'unalienable.'

This special investigation will unfold in a series of articles. A wealth of information has been uncovered, exposing a world-wide secret network that connects the sharpest intellects on the planet with global corporations and big government. That information is shocking, frightening, and even overwhelming, not only due to its far-reaching and dangerous implications but because of its intricate detail, careful planning, and multi-faceted approach to controlling every aspect of human life by seizing control of the key sectors of society that impact all of us--money, housing, healthcare, energy, and interpersonal communication.

Obviously this global network has been in the planning stages for a number of years, dating all the way back to the early 1970s and coming into sharper focus with the development of the Internet. President Ronald Reagan was able to provide a brief respite from the relentless march to the consolidation of centralized government power by his insistence on individual liberty and personal responsibility--and small government. But even then Reagan could not stem the tide enough to prevent its growth entirely.

Little creep.

He doesn't go into detail, but I'm sure he will.

'unalienable'

The question is often asked, "Is the word in the Declaration of Independence unalienable or is it inalienable?"

The final version of the Declaration uses the word "unalienable." Some earlier drafts used the word "inalienable," which is the term our modern dictionaries prefer. The two words mean precisely the same thing.

Little creep.

Exclusive in-depth investigation--Obama's secret plan for the 4th reich? Part 1
May 15, 1:29 PMConservative Examiner Anthony G. Martin

I'm sure it has something to do with "Jew Power" in the US.

What a Putz Andy is.

Live feed from Pastor Manning's press conference on Obama trial
May 21, 5:39 PMConservative ExaminerAnthony G. Martin

[video clip in original article, approx 30 mins of Manning then Q&A with Manning]

Free TV Show from Ustream
Dr. James Manning of the Atlah World Missionary Church in Harlem, New York gives a news conference this afternoon on the trial of Barack Obama, which rendered a verdict of guilty on 17 different charges.

If you have any comment on whether or not the BP Oil Spill is "Obama's Katrina", do stop over and tell Anthony.

http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conserv ... to-new-low

Anthony G. Martin says:
lg--Agreed. I would be the last to insult the men and women who serve in the front lines of the U.S. military. Yes, the Coast Guard was there. My inadvertent omission. But the Coast Guard is not enough to stop the oil from reaching the shore. THAT is not the soldiers of the military's fault--that is a dereliction of duty by the Obama Administration to properly deploy troops to build the barrier that would have stopped the oil from coming ashore.
May 26, 10:19 AM

Anthony G. Martin says:
Dan--NO IT DOESN'T. Oil companies are not in the business of doing what you are suggesting. BP has a responsibility to pay, but so does the company that runs the rig. And the EPA, FEMA, the Military, etc. sat idle because OBAMA and NAPOLITANO and others in the Administration refused to order them to prevent the oil from reaching the shore, which they could have done. Governor Bobby Jindal asked the Feds to start building a barrier to prevent the oil from coming ashore...he still has received no answer.

Thus, this Administration is derelict in its duty. If we are going to use oil, gasoline, petroleum based products, such as THE VERY COMPUTER YOU USE, then we are going to have to help with the cleanup, and that cleanup would not have been anywhere near this bad had the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION done its job ON DAY ONE.
May 26, 12:00 AM

Video--U.S. gov't, environmentalists to blame for Gulf oil disaster
June 14, 1:45 PMConservative ExaminerAnthony G. Martin


BP is a convenient scapegoat for those in the U.S. government and the environmentalist movement who are attempting to avoid any blame for the mega-disaster in the Gulf. The U.S. government and environmentalists are actually the ones to blame for the disaster.

Over the past 30 years the environmentalist movement has gained enormous influence over public policy and Left-leaning politicians at the state and federal levels. No greater example of this lunacy can be found than the opposition to oil drilling in ANWR.

(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File).

They successfully brought California's economy to the brink of disaster, at least in part, due to their insistence that the state cease from oil exploration, drilling, and refining, although the state uses more oil than any other in the nation. The result has been rolling blackouts and skyrocketing fuel prices.

At the national level the environmentalists used their influence to secure liberal support for legislation that effectively banned all oil drilling on land, as well as near the shoreline at the Gulf, the east coast, and the coast of California. This forced the oil companies to drill much further away from the shore, in the deep waters of the Gulf--which is precisely what led to the present crisis.

Could this be the reason that citizens have reported seeing FEMA trailers in odd places further inland? Is there a mass evacuation in the works for the entire Gulf region?

At that point I stated that if I were to be banned for defending myself against abusive behavior, I would proceed to write about it at Examiner. This brought a sharp rebuke from an administrator, and the abuse only continued to the point of claiming that I 'threatened' Free Republic because some people on the forum 'disagreed with me.'


The abuse only worsened as one poster in particular engaged in harassing, stalking behavior, taunting me with the accusation that I had 'threatened' Free Republic simply because someone disagreed with me. With every single threat I started on the forum, I would find a comment that continued with that false accusation. And another poster proceeded to republish my entire article without permission.

When I had reached my limit, I confronted the individuals in question, suggesting legal action if they would not cease from their abusive, harassing, and disrespectful behavior.

It was then that apparently the decision was made by moderators that I had crossed some sort of line by threatening legal action, although I found no rule forbidding it. Yet the moderator continued to allow what I considered to be abusive comments directed toward me personally.

And it was then I was told that I was banned from the site for being a 'troll.'

Fester says:
Over at FR, we're still waiting for the lawsuits you threatened.

You say you want people to read your material, then you grouse when they reprint your stuff for everyone to read.

I guess it's only worthwhile if you get a hit off it, eh? No purity for the cause? No genuine desire to inform educate?

Shameless self-promotion.
June 23, 9:32 AM

Fpub says:
To emphasize what another comment said, The Conservative Examiner was not banned. A specific poster who went by the handle Welshman was banned for spamming the site, threatening other members, and threatening to blackmail the site.
June 23, 9:26 AM

lg says:
This is a conservative sight and yet there are many who read it who are not conservative. Those disagreeing usually focus on information they consider incorrect or misinterpreted. By far, over the last few weeks most of the comments have been taken up by Philesq.

It seems the more conservative comments have made Anthony less tolerant of respecting (not agreeing) differing opinions. The hostility has escalated over the last few weeks.
The use of the word "troll" - I find particularly offensive. It implies that you don't even want to hear a different viewpoint and it negates the point of the comments section.

I am truly sorry that you may have been hurt, but if you were using the same kind of rhetoric that you have been using lately on this site - then I can understand their decision.

Maybe heat makes you cranky!
June 23, 9:22 AM

Does anybody know where that thread is? I'm not a freeper.

Retail prices for gasoline have climbed over the past week and are headed back toward a national average of $2.80 to $2.90 per gallon with higher prices on the West Coast, said Tom Kloza of the Oil Price Information Service.

Southern California prices are significantly higher.

On Monday, the average price for a gallon of regular, unleaded gas in the Los Angeles-Long Beach region was $3.11, up from $3.06 a week earlier and $3.09 a month ago, according to the Automobile Club of Southern California.

RT @welshman007: MARXISTS INFILTRATE CHURCHES!: http://tinyurl.com/2a5rl63 #foxnews #tlot #phnm

Yet ever since the latter part of the 19th century, churches have increasingly jumped on board the bandwagon with condescending moralizing about the evils of the profit motive, the virtues of the confiscation of the hard-earned wages of the citizens to pay for the freebies of others, and the near-blasphemous assertion that Jesus Himself was a proponent of Marxist principles.

The reason for the church's involvement in this wretchedness is not far to find. The Progressive Movement, from its inception in the late 1800s, proposed as one of its goals the infiltration of all institutions of society, including the church, in order to accomplish its subversive ends.

And infiltrate the church, they did...with a vengeance.

Thus, when the so-called 'compassionate humanitarians' of the Left, including those involved in 'Christian liberalism,' howl to high heaven about how cold and mean we conservatives are concerning the poor, my message to them is this--the next time you do what the Good Samaritan did, personally, individually tending to a wounded man, paying for his entire medical bill out of your own pocket without expecting ANY 'reimbursement' whatsoever, then and only then will I listen to your incessant drivel about how government needs to steal my money to help the poor.

Glenn Beck is really much more powerful than I had given him credit for. Sharon/Chalice talked about leaving her church for another that didn't promote social justice. The horror! Social justice. And this guy. And, I'm guessing lots more. I wonder what Jesus would think?

I guessing Beck skips those passages in Luke in which Jesus castigates the wealthy for the plight of the poor or when he praises the piety of those without means. I assume he also discounts those parts of Acts which describes the early church in Jerusalem as a communal society.

The facts have been presented clearly, and further posts from you containing charges like this will be summarily deleted. I am NOT putting up with this Obamanoid attempt at usurping my page again today.

That would be Andy "Internet Outhouse" Martin.

Anthony Martin is a little bit peeved today.



http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in ... ug-cartels