I didn't think it was possible, but Orly has hit a whole new level of crazy.

I would love to see the Judge's face when she reads that pile of poo.

Yeah, this one's definitely a Santorum - even by comparison to O'Rlynormality.

We have a winner!

Thanks, Loh. Most days my recollection ain't too good.

Just went though both of them. The majority of this steaming pile of taitz is her usual poorly cut and pasted mix of fonts, sizes, and formatting she uses to attack President Obama, with the usual gang of idiots as "exhibits".

She throws in claims that the GOP nominee for US Senate bought her nomination and the California GOP is corrupt, but it's mostly more of the same old piles of taitz about President Obama.

And pretty much all about Dr. Orly.

So not a clownselor, but who is Orly asking the Court to tell to stay the votes?

SoS Bowen is not a party.

Is that not a problem?

Nb. CCP, sec. 391(a):

* Taitz v. Obama (D.C. D.C.)
* Taitz v. Astrue (D.C. D.C.)
* Taitz v. Ruemmler (D.C. D.C)
* Taitz v. Bowen (Cal. Super Ct.)
* Taitz v. Fuddy (Haw. Super. Ct.)
* Taitz v. Sebelius (C.D. Cal.)
* Indiana ballot challenge
* Mississippi ballot challenge

However, only Bowen and Obama have been finally determined adversely. Astrue and Ruemmler are still alive (by threads). Fuddy is arguably still not even final. And the rest are still active.

One amongst many. This case should be transferred to Judge Glass.

One step at a time, bob. She's getting there.

Of the defendants, the only two that she accuses of any wrongdoing are Obama and Emken, and Emken's crime seems to be that she is a politician who hired other politicians for her campaign. Nonetheless, each of these defendants is going to have to spend thousands of dollars defending against this pile of crap. It will cost the OC Court and the State of California several thousand dollars in staff time and other resources to process this, and people in OC who have legitimate legal issues before the court will have to stand in line while this POS gets adjudicated.

I've lost all faith in the California BAR and anyone in a position to stop her from crapping up the legal profession. It's sickening.

The application for an emergency 45-day stay gave her an opportunity to tell yet another court that it will be committing treason if it does not comply with her demand.

Supposedly, all this is over, it now being after 6:00PM on the East Coast on July 12. Do we know whether Orly is in jail, the mental hospital, or the Tesla?

Interesting that, to my knowledge, she's not blasted this lawsuit all over her blawg. And if the hearing was held this morning and she won (she'd be gloating) and if she lost (screeching)... crickets.

Uh oh. No affidavit of Susan Daniels Private Eye hired *winkwink* to investigate Obama in 2009? Is Granny Sue dead to Orly now that she's filed her own action without kissing Orly's ring ass first?

She's offering information found by "the wayback machine"!

All sous-perlatives have been used up. There's nothing left to express the utter crapulousness, the cupidity, the ...sputter...narcissistic autobiography that is her output, indeed her soul.

My reaction as a non-lawyer is to cringe at this lunatic's characterization of Emken. I am a Democrat and will vote DiFi, but I am capable of seeing the opponents as decent human beings until they prove otherwise. Emken is someone who made a conscious decision to put her legal expertise to work supporting the disabled. As the parent of an autistic child, she decided to walk the walk not just donate money. To me, that is the harder road to take and she should be lauded for it, not smeared as a conniving lobbyist. What Orly says here seems to be slanderous (libelous? I can never tell which is which): She says, in essence, that Emken bribed the GOP to get the endorsement. I would like to see Emken do what our friends B&T wanted to do in Mississippi (unfortunately stuck in Mississippi mud, apparently): take her on instead of thinking that the best thing to do is just ignore her. Orly deserves to be whacked by being made to explain herself for a change, to be put on the defensive rather than allowed to run amok with impunity, and the only thing that will matter to her is to be taken down financially. If I could and I were Emken, I'd sue for millions. Let Orly see what it's like!

What got me was this part.



First off, Dr. Orly was one of two people in the Secretary of State primary, which was statewide. Emken ran for the 11th Congressional District primary, in a district that covers parts of five counties, and came in fourth out of five people. Furthermore, the GOP challenger that lost got 112,703 votes, and the Democrat that won got 115,361 (240,503 votes total). In other words, that district cast less votes for that race than Dr. Orly got for her statewide race.

She's not comparing apples and oranges here. She's comparing apples and rocks.

Second off, Dr. Orly has more name recognition. Which doesn't equal electability. Most of the people who know Dr. Orly immediately think of her as that deranged jackal who waves around piles of papers and sounds like she's looking for moose and squirrel. She's a joke in the minds most of voters, and has become more so since then.

Whew again!

Finally, in the third to last sentence, she threatens the judge with treason, compliciticity, aiding, abetting, Kool-Aiding and uncool abetting.

I thought she almost forgot!

The OC Register has posted the story:
O.C. ‘birther’ sues to block primary election results

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=165900


Anyone want to go "support" her tomorrow??

At least the President was notified of yesterday morning's ex parte hearing. Yulia Yun certifies that she notified him by calling the official White House comment line on July 10. She also went to Rick Williams' campaign Web site and left a message on his contact form.

Exhibit 11, which naturally follows Exhibit 12, lists the names and addresses of all those Californians who were born 01/01/1850. Pages 7 through 1 of 101 (presented in that order) contain irrefutable evidence of the extraordinary vintage of some of the voters of California. Unfortunately, many of these fine folks were "Voided in Polling Place," which must be a gruesome way to go.

She didn't post about this lawsuit until just now. I thought it was strange that she did not file a lawsuit over the election results, so I went to the OC court website looking for one, and there it was.

Whoa. That was quick.

The judge ALREADY made a bad ruling. I'm startin' to warm up to her ...