Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 726 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 30  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3516
Mr. Tepper and Mr. Begley are in big, big trouble, now that Orly has let loose the Flying Monkey Brigade on court staff.

](*,)

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
Oh, are the court staff in DC overseeing the Mississippi dockets now?

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 565
Location: Betwixt the Big and Black Cypress Bayous.
Occupation: Disabled. Krebb's disease.
How can Astrue argue with Orly's logic. ](*,)
Orly wrote:
14. For all of the above reasons not only the motion for affirmance needs to be denied, but the Court of appeals needs to issue a Summary judgment granting an appeal.

Orly has plenty of appeals, just no appeal. :lol:

_________________
IANALBIRTFb

ImageImageImage I, for one, have no problem being led by a 3500 year old Pharaoh who was trained by space aliens on a distant star.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
raicha wrote:
Oh, are the court staff in DC overseeing the Mississippi dockets now?
I don't think so but apparently Orly thinks the SCOM can take a case away from a federal court. :lol:

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
jtmunkus wrote:
Mr. Tepper and Mr. Begley are in big, big trouble, now that Orly has let loose the Flying Monkey Brigade on court staff.

](*,)


Wrong venue.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3516
realist wrote:
jtmunkus wrote:
Mr. Tepper and Mr. Begley are in big, big trouble, now that Orly has let loose the Flying Monkey Brigade on court staff.

](*,)


Wrong venue.


I'm looking on the OrlyDocket. Says it's all the same case. :oops:

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Southwest of down east
I'm sure the trial judge will be amused to learn he's been reversed by default summary judgment entered by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Appeals.

What's next then, the Cocktail Circuit?

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12899
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
I should think any reversal at all would be interpreted by Orly as meaning: "Reversed with instructions to order the immediate arrest of Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah."

First she had a trial on the merits in Georgia. The verdict was guilty, but the judge was bribed to say otherwise.

Then she got some evidence in Arizona ... well, it was her own evidence, but now it's Certified Confirmed®™ by Sheriff Joe.

Then she got discovery in Mississippi, when the defendants filed answers.



Now that she's won a default against the Director of the Social Security Administration ...


... I think we can proceed directly to the sentencing phase ... ?(

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Southwest of down east
Foggy wrote:
I should think any reversal at all would be interpreted by Orly as meaning: "Reversed with instructions to order the immediate arrest of Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah."

First she had a trial on the merits in Georgia. The verdict was guilty, but the judge was bribed to say otherwise.

Then she got some evidence in Arizona ... well, it was her own evidence, but now it's Certified Confirmed®™ by Sheriff Joe.

Then she got discovery in Mississippi, when the defendants filed answers.



Now that she's won a default against the Director of the Social Security Administration ...

... I think we can proceed directly to the sentencing phase ... ?(

I totally agree with this analysis. As for that sentencing phase, I'd recommend she file a state action in Texas, citing the Death Imposition Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (DIPAA).

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1971
Let the frogmarching begin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
An Update or two...

Quote:

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304
Docketed: 10/31/2011
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid
Case Type Information:
1) Civil US
2) United States
3) Originating Court Information:

District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Lead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge
Date Filed: 02/16/2011
Date Order/Judgment:
Date NOA Filed:
08/30/2011
10/25/2011
01/04/2012

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed [1351030] by Helen L. Gilbert and co-counsel Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellee Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

01/04/2012 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES FILED [1351031] by Michael James Astrue [Service Date: 01/04/2012 ] [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

01/04/2012 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1351032] to notice [1351030-2], certificate [1351031-2] filed by Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

01/19/2012 MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen)

02/13/2012 MOTION filed [1358927] by Orly Taitz to permit pro se electronic filing (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

02/13/2012 MOTION filed [1358929] by Orly Taitz to extend time to file response to motion for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

03/01/2012 CLERK'S ORDER filed [1361423] denying without prejudice motion to permit pro se electronic filing [1358927-2]; granting motion to extend time [1358929-2]; response to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] now due on 03/16/2012 [11-5304]

03/16/2012 INCORRECT DOCKET ENTRY-DISREGARD--RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364401] by Orly Taitz to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]--[Edited 03/20/2012 by KRM]

03/16/2012 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]

04/27/2012 MOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]



In Orlylaw, a "Motion" for Default is merely a matter of sending a letter.

NOTE: 3/16 Motion is suddenly LOCKED (new today) Not sure why but... (probably unredacted SS#) Just a WAG

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12899
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Quote:
Quote:
04/27/2012 (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012)
In Orlylaw, a "Motion" for Default is merely a matter of sending a letter.
Here on Planet Earth, all I can see there is "I'm taking this seriously for now, so yes you do have to file some sort of response telling me the fastest way to get rid of this lunatic."

But look at how strong Orly thinks her case is:

  • She DID file a motion for "summary reversal," as the clerk properly called it.
  • It was FILED. It WAS filed. It SAYS SO, dammit, right there on the docket.
  • And they had 30 days to respond, and El Zilcho.

There's no possible way out of this one. The boss is gonna be livid.

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
Well, not only that, but she's now triple-super-duper sure she'll receive a default judgment against Astrue cuz... by golly, gee whiz, if the docket sez a reply to her opposition is due on a certain date, and they simply don't file one, the case is automatically thrown into the default hopper of the appeal court.

How much more simple can it be?

I expect that Order granting default Any. Day. Now. \:D/

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
And those darn clerks just keep on a keepin' on messin' with Orly and doing things wrong... cuz that dastardly regime is in charge of 'em...

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=51223 :evil:

the clerks in DC finally filed my request, but docketted it wrong: it was supposed to be a request for the technical default. They entered it as a motion for a default judgment by the court, which is different

Posted on | April 30, 2012 | 1 Comment


They're about to get another screeching phone call!! :lol:

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 3371
Location: The 808
Occupation: World-class procrastinator and perpetual late-bloomer.
realist wrote:
And those darn clerks just keep on a keepin' on messin' with Orly and doing things wrong... cuz that dastardly regime is in charge of 'em...

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=51223 :evil:

the clerks in DC finally filed my request, but docketted it wrong: it was supposed to be a request for the technical default. They entered it as a motion for a default judgment by the court, which is different

Posted on | April 30, 2012 | 1 Comment


They're about to get another screeching phone call!! :lol:

](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

She wants the clerk to issue a default in a case where her opponent has appeared and filed documents, because they didn't respond to her batshit crazy opposition to their motion.

Oy.

_________________
"If it was a legitimately stolen election, Romney's body would have had ways of shutting that down. Also, if a usurpation happens, even in that horrible situation of a stolen election, it was God's will." -A Legal Lohengrin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
Well, I am sure the clerk will be convinced to see it her way once she points out the court rule or statute that allow a "technical default" to be entered.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9197
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
raicha wrote:
Well, I am sure the clerk will be convinced to see it her way once she points out the court rule or statute that allow a "technical default" to be entered.

Especially on appeal.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3516
raicha wrote:
Well, I am sure the clerk will be convinced to see it her way once she points out the court rule or statute that allow a "technical default" to be entered.


Because, of course, it is the clerk's decision.

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5769
Location: My business address is in Pennsylvania
It is always the clerk's decision. See, in Orlylaw, if there is one place anywhere -in any court, in any state, at any level - where there is a rule allowing a clerk to enter a "technical default", then that rule applies everywhere, in any court, in any state, at any level.

You guys are always saying that Orly Taitz never learns anything. But she does. And when she learns that one thing, she applies it everywhere and anywhere.

In California, if a properly served defendant fails to answer a complaint, the plaintiff may ask the clerk to enter a default. And the clerk has the authority to do that. Ipso facto, presto, ta da - that must be the rule that applies to the US Court of Appeals on the other side of country.

Orlylaw is easy and does not require actual study at a law school or personally sitting for a pesky bar exam.

_________________
ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5524
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
It's freakin' unbelievable that Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue failed to file a response. Orly's got him right where she wants him.

In the D.C. Circuit, a motion for summary affirmance or reversal must be filed within 45 days of docketing of the appeal. D.C. Circuit Rule 27(g). The appeal was docketed October 31, 2011. Orly filed her "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT" on March 16, 2012. Do the math.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5201
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
raicha wrote:
It is always the clerk's decision. See, in Orlylaw, if there is one place anywhere -in any court, in any state, at any level - where there is a rule allowing a clerk to enter a "technical default", then that rule applies everywhere, in any court, in any state, at any level.

You guys are always saying that Orly Taitz never learns anything. But she does. And when she learns that one thing, she applies it everywhere and anywhere.

In California, if a properly served defendant fails to answer a complaint, the plaintiff may ask the clerk to enter a default. And the clerk has the authority to do that. Ipso facto, presto, ta da - that must be the rule that applies to the US Court of Appeals on the other side of country.

Orlylaw is easy and does not require actual study at a law school or personally sitting for a pesky bar exam.


Orlylaw says the clerk makes the most important decisions, period. Look at the Supreme Court clerk Danny Bickell, who decides what the justices can and can't see. And Clerk Velamoor, who told Judge Carter what to write. They also handle the payments to bribe the judges. That's why you have to abuse clerks. Otherwise they'll get away with everything.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19999
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
It's freakin' unbelievable that Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue failed to file a response. Orly's got him right where she wants him.

In the D.C. Circuit, a motion for summary affirmance or reversal must be filed within 45 days of docketing of the appeal. D.C. Circuit Rule 27(g). The appeal was docketed October 31, 2011. Orly filed her "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT" on March 16, 2012. Do the math. The Obama regime is laughing its ass off.

[-X Butbutbut in Orlycalendar that's only 43 days and is within the prescribed time. There are 30 days in November, only 8 days in December (that count), 3 days in January, and February doesn't count. March starts counting on the Ides. Race. Itsa. Locator.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4929
Location: Glocca Morra
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
It's freakin' unbelievable that Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue failed to file a response. Orly's got him right where she wants him.

In the D.C. Circuit, a motion for summary affirmance or reversal must be filed within 45 days of docketing of the appeal. D.C. Circuit Rule 27(g). The appeal was docketed October 31, 2011. Orly filed her "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT" on March 16, 2012. Do the math. The Obama regime is laughing its ass off.


Mebee she was Zivving?

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23583
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
It's freakin' unbelievable that Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue failed to file a response. Orly's got him right where she wants him.

In the D.C. Circuit, a motion for summary affirmance or reversal must be filed within 45 days of docketing of the appeal. D.C. Circuit Rule 27(g). The appeal was docketed October 31, 2011. Orly filed her "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT" on March 16, 2012. Do the math.


It's a fatal defect that they filed a Motion for Summary Affirmance, Orly filed an Opposition (after receiving an extension to do so) and they did not file a reply to her Opposition... Orlylaw 101.

That gives her "perfect standing" for a Technical Default.

Even I know that. ;;)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7278
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
raicha wrote:
You guys are always saying that Orly Taitz never learns anything. But she does. And when she learns that one thing, she applies it everywhere and anywhere.

So by OrlyLaw, her dossies 1 through 5 are due to have their emissions hoses checked.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of unsound mind, a dimension of unreality, a dimension of really, really bad law. You've just crossed over into the Orly Zone." -- Geritol

ZOOM IN, BABY. IT'S ALL WRONG.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 726 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 30  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group