Taitz v Fuddy (HI Cir Ct) MtR2 - "Amended Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement" - Formerly MtR

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 1:22 am

I think we need another change of title, since the "Amended Motion Reciprocal" is history.

How about:

Taitz v Fuddy (HI Cir Ct) MtR2 - Formerly "Amended Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement" - Formerly MtR

SueDB · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 1:24 am

Or how about just Taitz vs Fuddy Death Match (NADT).....Round 3

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23582

Mikedunford wrote:

I think we need another change of title, since the "Amended Motion Reciprocal" is history.

How about:

Taitz v Fuddy (HI Cir Ct) MtR2 - Formerly "Amended Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement" - Formerly MtR

Did the best I could.

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 9:16 am

How about - "One Stoopid Motion After Another"?

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 9:20 am

Could ya maybe work the phrase ad nauseum into that title?

(It might reduce the need to fix that title again in the future.)

raicha · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 10:19 am

Geesh. Ya can only make 'em so long.

Joseph Robidoux III · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 10:26 am

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

How about - "One Stoopid Motion After Another"?

Why not have the greenies just make a: "Taitz v (fill in the blank) - One Stoopid Motion After Another" header ?

Copy & paste would save everyone some time for whatever new thread follows.

Shagnastie · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 10:37 am

Have to keep the "MtR" (Motion to Regurgitate) in there somewhere ...

Joseph Robidoux III · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 10:51 am

MtR and/or Emergency could be included in the boilerplate and the author decides to either strike or leave.

OK, I'll stop.

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 12:01 pm

Taitz v Fuddy - The Continuing Saga.

Suranis · **Joined:** Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:04 am **Posts:** 5253

Taitz V Fuddy, MTR, inspired by Jarndace V Jarndace.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2475

Suranis wrote:

Taitz V Fuddy, MTR, inspired by Jarndace V Jarndace.

Nah .. that's reserved for Liberi/Berg v Taitz & all the world

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 1:23 pm

tjh wrote:

Suranis wrote:

Taitz V Fuddy, MTR, inspired by Jarndace V Jarndace.

Nah .. that's reserved for Liberi/Berg v Taitz & all the world

I think if you guys research this more carefully, you'll discover that Jarndyce & Jarndyce has been reserved at TFB to We the Purple (i.e., Purpura).

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2475

Piffle wrote:

tjh wrote:

Suranis wrote:

Taitz V Fuddy, MTR, inspired by Jarndace V Jarndace.

Nah .. that's reserved for Liberi/Berg v Taitz & all the world

I think if you guys research this more carefully, you'll discover that Jarndyce & Jarndyce has been reserved at TFB to We the Purple (i.e., Purpura).

Hmmm .... maybe LIBERI , et al. v BELCHER, et al. (N.D. TX) ?
(Bankrupt v bankrupt)

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri May 04, 2012 2:23 pm

tjh wrote:

Hmmm .... maybe LIBERI , et al. v BELCHER, et al. (N.D. TX) ?
(Bankrupt v bankrupt)

Chickenfeed compared to Purpura's protracted win-at-any-cost divorce. A starting point

They are quite a bunch, aren't they?

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2475

Piffle wrote:

Chickenfeed compared to Purpura's protracted win-at-any-cost divorce. A starting point

They are quite a bunch, aren't they?

You win .. I wasn't connecting it to Purpura v Purpura.

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Fri May 11, 2012 10:27 pm

MtR2 has been denied.

Quote:

Print | Help | New Search | Exit
Court Minutes Text

Case Title: DR ORLY TAITZ ESQ VS LORETTA FUDDY ETAL 1CC11-1-001731

Div.: 1C10 NH DATE: 05-01-2012 Time: Priority: 0 Judge I.D.: JRNISHI
Video No.: Audio No.:
Minutes: 5/11/12 MINUTE ORDER:
THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW
INFORMATION, FILED ON 4/24/12, IS DENIED.
PREVAILING PARTY TO PREPARE THE ORDER.
***
COPIES OF THE MINUTE ORDER GIVEN TO:
ORLY TAITZ, ESQ. (VIA U.S. MAIL)
JILL NAGAMINE, ESQ. (VIA COURT JACKET)

Piffle · **Posted:** Fri May 11, 2012 10:30 pm

What, Judge Nishimura didn't even grant oral arguments?

Sorry, Orly. It's a Friday, dontcha know.

ZekeB · **Posted:** Fri May 11, 2012 11:07 pm

All those MonkeyMiles^tm and Lena doesn't get to use them? I haz a sad.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3513

LM K wrote:

(from Indiana thread) I want Vex Lit and sanctions done properly so that Orly can't drag out the appeal process. I get very frustrated that Orly hasn't been sanctioned severely yet. I get really pissed that Orly can abuse taxpayer dollars in the way that she does. However, our system gives Orly rights. But I think Nagamine is setting this up in such a way that other states will be able to use the expected Hawaiian Vex Lit ruling to give other states an easy opportunity to smack Orly down fast and hard.

I really think that Jill Nagamine will take care of the vex lit motion well in advance of the general election. I'm sure they expect much more birther activity in the coming months, and a vex lit ruling and huge sanctions on the most vociferous of the birthers will go a long way in deterring other wannabe birther summiteers and their mistresses from pestering HDOH.

Mikedunford · **Posted:** Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:44 pm

jtmunkus wrote:

LM K wrote:

(from Indiana thread) I want Vex Lit and sanctions done properly so that Orly can't drag out the appeal process. I get very frustrated that Orly hasn't been sanctioned severely yet. I get really pissed that Orly can abuse taxpayer dollars in the way that she does. However, our system gives Orly rights. But I think Nagamine is setting this up in such a way that other states will be able to use the expected Hawaiian Vex Lit ruling to give other states an easy opportunity to smack Orly down fast and hard.

I really think that Jill Nagamine will take care of the vex lit motion well in advance of the general election. I'm sure they expect much more birther activity in the coming months, and a vex lit ruling and huge sanctions on the most vociferous of the birthers will go a long way in deterring other wannabe birther summiteers and their mistresses from pestering HDOH.

Again, bear in mind that there are only so many people working for the Hawaii AG, only so many hours in the day, and birther nonsense probably isn't something that was built into their manpower needs calculations. The more birther activity there is, the less time becomes available for things that aren't strictly necessary.

The AZ verification request, the cold case posse, the other birther lawsuits, and even the Mississippi verification all take time. So does the regular workload.

Orly is not the center of the galaxy.

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3513

Mikedunford wrote:

jtmunkus wrote:

I really think that Jill Nagamine will take care of the vex lit motion well in advance of the general election. I'm sure they expect much more birther activity in the coming months, and a vex lit ruling and huge sanctions on the most vociferous of the birthers will go a long way in deterring other wannabe birther summiteers and their mistresses from pestering HDOH.

Again, bear in mind that there are only so many people working for the Hawaii AG, only so many hours in the day, and birther nonsense probably isn't something that was built into their manpower needs calculations. The more birther activity there is, the less time becomes available for things that aren't strictly necessary.

The AZ verification request, the cold case posse, the other birther lawsuits, and even the Mississippi verification all take time. So does the regular workload.

Orly is not the center of the galaxy.

My point is not that the AG is dragging her feet, quite the contrary. My understanding is that Hawai'i, like the 56 other states in the Union, has had budget shortages and is working with a razor-thin staff.

If Hawai'i is willing to take Taitz to task before the general election - when it's likely there will be a flurry of birfing - with strong enough punishment, it likely would severely curtail the birther activities in Honolulu. Which would severely curtail the birther workload on Nagamine, Quinn, Nishimura, Fuddy, and all of the other fine people (like mikedunford!) who have been so inconvenienced by this fraudulent smear campaign against the president.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

Taitz v Fuddy (HI Cir Ct) MtR2 - "Amended Motion Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement" - Formerly MtR

Who is online