It gets worse: Hendershot now says that the database he searched no longer associates Bounel's name with Obama's social security number.

It gets worse: Hendershot now says that the database he searched no longer associates Bounel's name with Obama's social security number.

Plaintiff also submits a “verification results” page from the Social Security Number Verification System (“SSNVS”) indicating that social security number xxx-xx-4425 is “not in file (never issued).” Pl.’s Opp’n to Mot. for Summ. J. Ex. 2 [31]. She argues that this page is further evidence that the SSA is covering up the President’s use of social security number xxx-xx-4425. The SSA uses the SSNVS to provide employers with a means of verifying the names and social security numbers of employees. See SSNVS Handbook, http://www.ssa.gov/employer/ssnvshandbk ... ndbook.pdf. “Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from SSA under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.” Id. at 5. As with the registration acknowledgement form discussed above, the Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer. The Court notes that both documents submitted by plaintiff are incomplete; the address on the registration acknowledgment form and the employer identification number on the SSNVS page have been blacked out, further confirming the documents’ fraudulent origins. For all of these reasons, the Court will disregard both documents as well as any arguments made in reliance on them.

This report is accompanied with a confirmation and authentication of Colonel Gregory Hollister, who personally obtained the report.

Good thing her request for judicial notice includes this statement:


Otherwise the court might think Orly herself used SSNVS in violation of federal law.

A federal judge had ordered the documents unsealed in November 2011, but they were kept sealed for 18 months and not posted on the court’s online docket until last week, after The Post inquired about them.

Lamberth blamed a series of administrative errors and said a review of the “performance of the personnel involved is underway.” He also said he was creating a new category on the court’s Web site where all search and arrest warrants will be made public unless they fall under a separate sealing order.

Lamberth blamed a series of administrative errors and said a review of the “performance of the personnel involved is underway.” He also said he was creating a new category on the court’s Web site where all search and arrest warrants will be made public unless they fall under a separate sealing order.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=422233

Yes, the captions of Taitz's requests violate the federal rules.

Holy crap! This is in fact the very same case for which Orly's earlier redaction failures led to Lambert's famous statement that she was "either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity." And now she puts the SSN in the captions?

Come on folks. How much plainer can she say "please sanction my toying and stupid ass"?

It's her new magical spell, she'll submit everything with a request for judicial notice until she's forced to recognise that it doesn't work. She'll never accept that she's doing it wrong, she'll just move on to the next magical spell that will make the courts sit up and do her bidding. I'm sure she believes that she just needs to find the right form of words, and voila! Les grenouilles marcheront. Any. Day. Now.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=422407

https://docs.google.com/gview?url=http: ... hrome=true

...who knew you could submit affidavits with requests for A judicial notice.

Will Taitz ever realize that what worked for her when she terrorized the parents of students, and the teachers, at 'Tarbut v'Torah Day School, doesn't work outside of a small community like that, where people just want to be left alone?