ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1964

Foggy wrote:

... just means more people going to prison for EVAR, after Orly takes over this great land of ours.

I hate to say it, but I know I'm fairly high up on her little list.

Start practicing your frogmarch.

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:42 am

Chilidog wrote:

Foggy wrote:

... just means more people going to prison for EVAR, after Orly takes over this great land of ours.

I hate to say it, but I know I'm fairly high up on her little list.

Start practicing your frogmarch.

A bird doing an amphibian march? Oh, the inhumanity!

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1964

OK, he can do the Chicken Polka instead.

Reality Check · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:19 pm

You mean?

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3496

The FogMarch list.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:32 pm

A confusing thing to me about California's new primary system: does this mean that anyone can declare themselves to be Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, or Green and have that party affiliation show up on the ballot? Are the political parties entirely without say on such matters?

A Legal Lohengrin · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm **Posts:** 9344

TollandRCR wrote:

A confusing thing to me about California's new primary system: does this mean that anyone can declare themselves to be Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, or Green and have that party affiliation show up on the ballot? Are the political parties entirely without say on such matters?

Essentially, yes. If you wonder why that's legal, compare Wash. State Grange v. Wash. State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008) to Cal. Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000). Then tell me the distinction between them makes a lick of sense.

I've discussed these cases in a different context here, but I wouldn't recommend relying on my muddled gibberish. For a genuine misunderstanding of the issue, I recommend reading the muddled gibberish of the Supreme Court itself.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:51 pm

Very few people will be aware of the new open primary system. The only thing we can count on is confusion and unintended consequences. I for one prefer run-offs and abhor elections where someone can be elected with small percentages of electorate voting for them. Run-offs give time to focus on two candidates and their differences and a better chance they will be vetted by the voters and the opposition.

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:32 pm

i saw this tweet:

Quote:

Liz Mair @LizMair

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

Feinstein campaign forwards email from Orly Taitz in fundraising email. #birthers

No idea what that's about. I bet it's funny though.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:35 pm

mimi wrote:

i saw this tweet:

Quote:

Liz Mair @LizMair

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

Feinstein campaign forwards email from Orly Taitz in fundraising email. #birthers

No idea what that's about. I bet it's funny though.

You're slowing down.. viewtopic.php?f=24&t=5161&start=925#p347145

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:15 pm

Thank you, GG. And I suppose that she used the list she rented from Sharon Angle for this?

***off to take my Geritol now.

Didja notice the kitties in her outfit? :-bd

ZekeB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:16 pm

mimi wrote:

Didja notice the kitties in her outfit? :-bd

They were up there back then? You must be older than me.

mimi · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:25 pm

mebbe. but i'm timeless. $\:D/$

Whatever4 · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:11 pm

mimi wrote:

Didja notice the kitties in her outfit? :-bd

Wuh? Oh, you said Kitties. Read that as a different word.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:31 pm

A Legal Lohengrin wrote:

...For a genuine misunderstanding of the issue, I recommend reading the muddled gibberish of the Supreme Court itself.

I just heard a discussion on NPR of the muddled thinking in Citizens United, so I'll have to wait until tomorrow for another SCOTUS muddling.

SueDB · **Posted:** Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:08 pm

mimi wrote:

i saw this tweet:

Quote:

Liz Mair @LizMair

Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open

Feinstein campaign forwards email from Orly Taitz in fundraising email. #birthers

No idea what that's about. I bet it's funny though.

Mebbe it's the one with the picture Orly stole from CNN. I wonder how CNN feels about not getting credit for their work. She can put Orly's ad in and then her own campaign letter describing the freak show and whether Californians would have her or some really bizarre foreign freak show.

,,,,,,,,,,, Not enough commas #-o

Chilidog · **Joined:** Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm **Posts:** 1964

This event is starting soon, is it not? Any word on the queen?

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:34 pm

Chilidog wrote:

This event is starting soon, is it not? Any word on the queen?

Here's the schedule of events:http://www.meetup.com/California-For-Rick-Santorum/events/52010192/

Also posted on GOP candidates thread.

ducktape · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:37 pm

You know, I wonder if that's the right venue, or if she was confused. Didn't she tell everyone San Jose, and wasn't that the Ron Paul group that was meeting there? I think the ones where she telling them "I'm coming with my supporter and you had better let me speak" was in San Jose.

esseff44 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:16 pm

ducktape wrote:

You know, I wonder if that's the right venue, or if she was confused. Didn't she tell everyone San Jose, and wasn't that the Ron Paul group that was meeting there? I think the ones where she telling them "I'm coming with my supporter and you had better let me speak" was in San Jose.

Both are in Burlingame today so both can be attended.

The Liberty Caucus is having their convention big main event today and the events are just a short distance from the CA GOP larger convention. Here's their line-up for today.

http://www.rlcca.org/dw/doku.php/public ... burlingame

The 2:00 rally where candidates are given 10 minutes to speak was scheduled for the Hyatt/Burlingame.
http://www.rlcca.org/dw/doku.php/public ... burlingame

Litlebritdifrnt2 · **Posted:** Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:11 pm

Of course Orly Taitz's bid for Senator is completely invalid, cause she is not a citizen. Prove me wrong Orly.

GreatGrey · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:47 pm

Blast from the past, 2010:

I don't think Obly will be getting the coveted McCain endorsement anytime soon.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

I just gave an interview to Channel 4 Bay area. Pictures with Newt Gingrich, Tim Powlenty and GOP national chairman Rense Preibus will be posted later today
:evil:

XXX-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32166 :evil:

Quote:

I was interviewed by Channel 4 Bay Area and was asked, whether a more conservative platform of the California GOP will cause the candidates to lose independant voters.

... nary a mention of SSN's etc etc ...

My provision of a tariff or duty on the corporations importing products from the third world countries will help overcome the disparity in cost, which is caused by the added expense of stringent EPA regulations. It will help CA and US companies as a whole to stay more competitive

This was the jest of my answer

SueDB · **Posted:** Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:13 pm

They are saving it for the comedy relief part of the news.

bob · **Posted:** Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:09 pm

Quote:

Sacramento Bee and top adviser for Diane Feinstein: “Orly Taitz will probably win the primary”

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=32262 :twisted:

The money quote from the linked Sac Bee article:

Quote:

"If this race plays out as a bunch of unknowns who have no serious funding, Orly Taitz will probably win the primary," said Feinstein adviser Bill Carrick, referring to the so-called "birther" activist who said last year she might enter the race.

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online