ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Foggy · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 1:16 pm

I don't have time to read all the blogs. All I have time for is to maintain links to all the blogs instead. :lol:

We averaged 360 posts a day in April. I back up the database every day, and all the files once a week, and spend about 3 hours a day on the board and that's all I can take for my hobby.

I demand a 35 hour day, then maybe I can spend another couple hours online ... :angry:

MsDaisy · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 1:25 pm

You is a hard working rooster Foggy, that's for sure.

All of us appreciate all your hard work. Without you we'd be like a homeless famibly. :hug:

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

Foggy wrote:

.... and that's all I can take for my hobby.

HOBBY? You're not fully paid by Mr S ?

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

neonzx wrote:

Lena pimping Lena...

Dr. Orly Taitz leads all GOP candidates going into June 5 primary
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=63249 :evil:

Link to the revised-voice promo .. AND to

Poll: Orly Taitz leads GOP Senate field
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/poll-orly-taitz-leads-gop-senate-field/
Published: 03/18/2012

(and links in turn to :http://totalbuzz.ocregister.com/2012/03/16/o-c-birther-leads-gop-senate-field/83355/ )

Nothing like an up-to-date poll !!!!

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 2:10 pm

Well, Orly does lead in the crucial CalGuns poll, as she keeps reposting on her Web site. At last count, she had 24 votes to Emken's 23, with the last post being made on 5/13 (not necessarily the last vote, however).

anotherparadox · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 3:50 pm

Foggy wrote:

anotherparadox wrote:

Here are the numbers and search words used in the last week to find my blog

Uh, your what? You have a blog that talks about Orly Taitz much? You don't even have a website listed in your profile! I don't even know if you is male or femalian! Why aren't I helping publicize your blog? Why aren't we all reading your blog?

My intent in the blog isn't so much informational as much as it is to irritate Orly Taitz. She was the first to find out about it and was kind enough to post a link to it on her blog in one of her posts where she complained about it. The way I look at it and the statistics, there are a high percentage of people interested in Orly Taitz being disbarred. :mrgreen:

bob · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 5:04 pm

"For the record": Taitz's opponent, Dan Hughes, has now sent me two spam e-mails.

Doesn't he know the more effective method to get your message out is to send a volunteer, loaded with fliers, to Truckee?

jtmunkus · **Joined:** Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm **Posts:** 3496

bob wrote:

"For the record": Taitz's opponent, Dan Hughes, has now sent me two spam e-mails.

Doesn't he know the more effective method to get your message out is to send a volunteer, loaded with fliers, to Truckee?

Orly doesn't even provide the flyers. She emails the 'volunteer'
a .PDF with instructions to copy them on their own dime.

I heard.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

WOW! Senator Diane Feinstein agreed to debate me. However she has 5 conditions: FOX news is not allowed to transmit the debates, we are not allowed to talk about Obama’s eligibility, my supporters will not be allowed in and so on. Should I agree to these conditions?
:evil:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=63446 :evil:

Quote:

Dear Dr. Taitz,

It looks like you may end up being the California Republican nominee for Senate in the November general election. While I understand that you wanted to set up some debates before the June primary, this would have been inappropriate given the large field of candidates.

However if, as anticipated, you do become the Republican candidate, I would like to set up three debates to be televised by three major television stations. The debates would take place in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego.Our campaign would suggest evening debates at 18:00 in order to capture a higher percentage of viewers.

However, our campaign has five ground rules which we would like agreement upon before proceeding further:

(1) No questions shall be asked and no answers shall be given concerning the eligibility of President Obama or any related matters. The debate should focus on economic, social, and foreign policy issues.

(2) The format of the debates shall provide for a two minute response, followed by a one minute rebuttal, followed by a 30 second response.

(3) No notes, documents, or teleprompters shall be allowed.

(4) No debates shall be televised by Fox News or any affiliates thereof.

(5) None of your supporters shall be allowed to attend. Guests shall be limited to 100 voters chosen at random.

Please let me know if these ground rules would be satisfactory. Also, please let me know of nine potential dates in October during which you would be available.

Kind regards,

Sef Greene

Debate Coordinator

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Edit: tjh beat me by microseconds! :evil:

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23548

At first I thought there was a double post. :lol:

Sterngard Friegen · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 6:41 pm

Taitz can agree to the conditions and then violate them during the debate, so I don't see a downside for her. As for Dianne Feinstein, she'll be able to show what a complete nut Taitz is and the Democrats will be able to use that throughout the country to tie Taitz to the Republican Party.

However, I suspect that the real purpose of this e-mail is to force the Republican Party to spend some money on the Senate campaign in California in order to avoid Taitz becoming the nominee. :lol:

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Sterngard Friegen wrote:

Taitz can agree to the conditions and then violate them during the debate, so I don't see a downside for her. As for Dianne Feinstein, she'll be able to show what a complete nut Taitz is and the Democrats will be able to use that throughout the country to tie Taitz to the Republican Party.

However, I suspect that the real purpose of this e-mail is to force the Republican Party to spend some money on the Senate campaign in California in order to avoid Taitz becoming the nominee. :lol:

And what a pity any of those outcomes would be.

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 6:52 pm

Even the least experienced of Dianne Feinstein's campaign staff knows that there is zero evidence that Orly Taitz will end up being the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate. This is a spoof.

kate520 · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 6:56 pm

Seth Green?

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

Quote:

6 Responses to “WOW! Senator Diane Feinstein agreed to debate me. However she has 5 conditions: FOX news is not allowed to transmit the debates, we are not allowed to talk about Obama’s eligibility, my supporters will not be allowed in and so on. Should I agree to these conditions?”

Mark Smith
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:40 pm

It’s a trap- they already know how they will discredit you.

HAHA TalkToSelf
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:44 pm

HAHAHAHA…. well if you do this debate then you will qualify for a straight jacket for talking to yourself.

She has a stacked audience geared to BOO BOO her opposition… SHE IS NUTS. She needs JAIL TIME too.

Ken B. (Fort Mill, SC)
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:45 pm

ABSOLUTELY NOT!!

John G.
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:48 pm

If it were me Dr.Orly I would never agree to those terms, those are all issues that need to be debated in a public forum and no limit on who can attend!! Good Luck!!!

Redd
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:54 pm

Do not agree and let all of california know of these commie conditions imposed. I can understand the “crowd control” but not discussing eligibility for presidency or having fox news as one of three networks is bullcommie.

John Black
May 14th, 2012 @ 2:55 pm

Absolutely not, rather send Fienstein a message asking what she’s afraid of. You don’t suppose the truth might come out?

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 7:03 pm

kate520 wrote:

Seth Green?

It says "Sef" Greene, but Orly probably thinks it is the actor. I think Orly has been well and truly fooled.

bob · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 7:13 pm

Concur on spoof:

Quote:

However if, as anticipated, you do become the Republican candidate, I would like to set up three debates to be televised by three major television stations. The debates would take place in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego.Our campaign would suggest evening debates at 18:00 in order to capture a higher percentage of viewers

1. Why have this discussion now? On June 6, everyone will know who are the finalists. For the November election. And, IIRC, Feinstein didn't even debate her 2006 opponent ever.

2. 18:00? IN AMERICA, we say "6 P.M."

AnitaMaria · **Joined:** Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm **Posts:** 2107

The debate offer came from this email address: Feinstein2012@aol.com. [-(

Plutodog · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 7:18 pm

Not if we're stick-in-the-mud ex-GI. [-(

I gots my watches and phones set to military time. $\:D/$

bob · **Posted:** Mon May 14, 2012 7:20 pm

AnitaMaria wrote:

The debate offer came from this email address: Feinstein2012@aol.com.

The campaign sends mail from feinstein2012.com and diannefeinstein2012.com.

](*,)

This board requires you to be registered and logged-in before you can view hidden messages

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

Haha thought so

Boy is she gullible.

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

HEY, what happened to the NO HELPING rule? You've all ruined a perfectly good punking. [-(

BillTheCat · **Joined:** Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:25 pm **Posts:** 1428

neonzx wrote:

HEY, what happened to the NO HELPING rule? You've all ruined a perfectly good punking. [-(

I think it rates as a pretty durn good punkin' even with our "help" (and by "help" I mean entering the email on Google like any sane person would) :mrgreen:

neonzx · **Joined:** Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am **Posts:** 4216

More comments...

Quote:

Muttdog
May 14th, 2012 @ 3:11 pm

Whaddaya mean should you agree? Of course you should debate unless you’re a wet-your-pants chicken-shit coward.

Maria
May 14th, 2012 @ 3:12 pm

Dr. Taitz,
Absolutely not!
What is Feinstein afriad of?
Sounds like a trap to discredit you.

Congratulations! She agress you’re winning.

Get elected and put all them ALL in orange jumpsuits!

hipshotpercusion
May 14th, 2012 @ 3:12 pm

Tell the old bat to get bent! Who in the hell does she think she is?

Patrick Oh
May 14th, 2012 @ 3:22 pm

That is not a debate, it’s a rhetorical firing squad. I wouldn’t participate in any forum that isn’t wide open to all topics. I would use that letter as a tool in your campaign.

God bless America, and you and yours, Orly!

garth
May 14th, 2012 @ 3:24 pm

Any Debate should have the top 5, her, you and
3 others, in a panel forum. This allows a cross section of ideas and will not allow her
to a say you would not debate her. Also, any questions to respond to, should be the same for all concerned and the lineup for responses should rotate. No Anderson Cooper, types as moderators and have 2 moderators from different camps

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

ORLY TAITZ IS NOT GOING TO BE CALIFORNIA'S JUNIOR SENATOR

Who is online