Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 400 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 16  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23525
Update.

I don't know what Document 16 is, but it was filed by Strunk...

Quote:
STRUNK CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. NYS BOARD OF ELECTIONS (006500/2011) Updated


016 04/12/2012 PLAINT Other Reliefs No Decided: 18-JUN-12
MOTION DEEMED MOOT
Before Justice: SCHACK
Short Form Order
06/18/2012


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9126
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
OBC: Van Allen vs. NYS Board Of Elections dismissed
Quote:
At least the state failed in its bid to impose sanctions.

In opposing respondent’s motion to dismiss, petitioner maintains that he brings this proceeding “to protect[] his personal intangible vote property in this 2012 election cycle” ‘(Petitioner’s Response in Opposition, ~ 23). However, the allegedly faulty instruction given by the SBOE regarding the Natural Born Citizen Clause in no way denies petitioner his right to vote in the 2012 general election. Petitioner, who is not an enrolled member of the Democratic party, remains free to support and vote for a candidate of his choosing (see Berg v Obama, 586 F3d 234,239-240 [3d Cir 2009]; Hollander v McCain, 566 F Supp2d 63,69-70 [D NH 2008]; see also Crist v Comm ‘n on Presidential Debates, 262 F3d 193, 195 [2d Cir 2001]). And it is clear that petitioner’s interest in compelling the SBOE to adopt his interpretation of the Natural Born Citizen Clause and to use his preferred terminology in its publications is in no “way different from that of the public at large” (Society of Plastics, 77 NY2d at 773-774). As such, petitioner’s interest is far too generalized and unparticularized to support standing under the facts and circumstances of this case (see Berg at 240 [collecting authorities]).

In view of petitioner’s lack of standing to maintain the instant proceeding, there is no reason to consider respondent’s additional contentions that this proceeding is barred by principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel based upon prior litigation undertaken by Christopher-Earl Strunk, an alleged privy of petitioner, and that the petition is non-justiciable insofar as the Electoral College is the sole and exclusive forum in which objections to the selection of a President may be determined.

Finally, the branch of respondent’s motion seeking the imposition of monetary and nonmonetary sanctions is denied. While respondent’s counsel refers to “repetitive” and “numerous vexatious and harassing lawsuits” commenced by petitioner, nothing in the record confirms this assertion. And the mere fact that a trial court of coordinate jurisdiction rejected similar claims advanced by an alleged privy of petitioner does not render the instant petition frivolous within the meaning of Part 130 of the Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4402
Location: between the candle and the star
bob wrote:
OBC: Van Allen vs. NYS Board Of Elections dismissed
Quote:
At least the state failed in its bid to impose sanctions.

In opposing respondent’s motion to dismiss, petitioner maintains that he brings this proceeding “to protect[] his personal intangible vote property in this 2012 election cycle” ‘(Petitioner’s Response in Opposition, ~ 23). However, the allegedly faulty instruction given by the SBOE regarding the Natural Born Citizen Clause in no way denies petitioner his right to vote in the 2012 general election. Petitioner, who is not an enrolled member of the Democratic party, remains free to support and vote for a candidate of his choosing (see Berg v Obama, 586 F3d 234,239-240 [3d Cir 2009]; Hollander v McCain, 566 F Supp2d 63,69-70 [D NH 2008]; see also Crist v Comm ‘n on Presidential Debates, 262 F3d 193, 195 [2d Cir 2001]). And it is clear that petitioner’s interest in compelling the SBOE to adopt his interpretation of the Natural Born Citizen Clause and to use his preferred terminology in its publications is in no “way different from that of the public at large” (Society of Plastics, 77 NY2d at 773-774). As such, petitioner’s interest is far too generalized and unparticularized to support standing under the facts and circumstances of this case (see Berg at 240 [collecting authorities]).


Those two bolded statements are confusing me a bit - what, exactly, is the court saying? The way I'm reading it at the moment sounds like the judge is agreeing that the info from the SBOE on the NBC clause is or may be faulty, and that the interpretation of the NBC standard that he wants the court to accept is no different than everyone else's. I have no doubt that I'm wrong on both accounts - today's being a really bad brain day, but I can't wrap my head around what actually IS being said here.

Thanks for any help!

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9126
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
lyssandri wrote:
Thanks for any help!

Plaintiff's right to vote is not affected by the board's language, and that plaintiff lacks standing to force a change.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:17 am
Posts: 4402
Location: between the candle and the star
bob wrote:
lyssandri wrote:
Thanks for any help!

Plaintiff's right to vote is not affected by the board's language, and that plaintiff lacks standing to force a change.


OK - that helps, thanks :)

_________________
We have all the wins in court. And Obama is the President.
- Epectitus


I am gray...

I stand between the candle and the star
...between the darkness and the light

-- Paraphrased from "Babylon 5" created by J. Michael Straczynski

"Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand'
-- from "Witch Hunt" by Rush on their "Moving Pictures" album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9126
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
OBC: Van Allen intends to appeal.

:yawn:

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 2095
Van Allen has submitted a motion to reargue his case. I think he is arguing that he should get another chance because the defendant's lawyer, the judge, and the court clerk are all big poopyheads who were mean to him.

The motion can be found on his scribd site.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19895
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Van Allen is all pissy that the New York Elections Board uses the phrase "born a citizen" and then Van Allen botches the Constitutional phrase by writing "natural-born Citizen."

Buffoon.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 3968
Location: Southwest of down east
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Van Allen is all pissy that the New York Elections Board uses the phrase "born a citizen" and then Van Allen botches the Constitutional phrase by writing "natural-born Citizen."

De minimus. What is at stake here is nothing less than a citizen's fundamental right to correct disagreeable verbiage in a government pamphlet or web page.

Face it Stern, there's a world of different between being born a citizen (totally incorrect) and being a natural born citizen. Forget about that hypercharged hyphen; this is a serious Constitutional issue. The courts must intervene. Heads must roll.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 9:09 pm
Posts: 143
I don't believe his use of "natural-born citizen" is an accident at all. That is how the phrase is constructed in every instance in Minor v. Happersett, and he is deliberately trying to get a court to rule that it is the same as the literal three-word phrase in the Constitution. He knows his Apuzzo, and he know's this is a fundamental weakness in the putz's "every punctuation mark and capitalization tells a story" theory.

This is no more an accident than when a Republican refers to the "Democrat Party."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9326
Piffle wrote:
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
Van Allen is all pissy that the New York Elections Board uses the phrase "born a citizen" and then Van Allen botches the Constitutional phrase by writing "natural-born Citizen."

De minimus. What is at stake here is nothing less than a citizen's fundamental right to correct disagreeable verbiage in a government pamphlet or web page.

Face it Stern, there's a world of different between being born a citizen (totally incorrect) and being a natural born citizen. Forget about that hypercharged hyphen; this is a serious Constitutional issue. The courts must intervene. Heads must roll.


The use of "de minimus" in this post renders it entirely false. De minimis non curat lex is the phrase. Not every Latin word ending in an "s" ends in "us," just to gripe.

I ordinarily don't engage in this kind of declension Nazism, but this is probably the only site I'm on where anyone would care. I apologize for a Latin declension threadjack, but if anyone suggests I start such a thread, and I'm looking at you greenies, I will cordially suggest you do something I am not allowed to suggest you do, cordially or otherwise.

Edit: The very first sentence in this post is sarcasm, not a serious statement. Everything following it is complete gibberish.


Edit: I could just hang my head in shame and delete this post, but I think I'll leave it as a monument to my own stupidity instead. I don't always herp, but when I herp, I derp.


Edit: And actually, although I completely forgot the minimus joke for some reason, the post somehow makes sense anyway.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9126
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Piffle wrote:
De minimus.

For the noobs: Here's the reference.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 3968
Location: Southwest of down east
Tithiegypdithiego.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Intersection of Godwin Dr. and Poe Blvd.
Occupation: Personal security.
1 guest wrote:
He knows his Apuzzo, and he know's this is a fundamental weakness in the putz's "every punctuation mark and capitalization tells a story" theory.

Inigo Montoya: You are using de Vattel's Defense against me, ah?
Man in Black: I thought it fitting considering the volcanic terrain.
Inigo: Naturally, you must suspect me to attack with Lujan-Defenders of Wildlife?
Man in Black: Naturally, but I find that Keyes cancels out Lujan. Don’t you?
Inigo: Unless the enemy has studied his Apuzzo… which I have.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 1963
verbalobe wrote:
1 guest wrote:
He knows his Apuzzo, and he know's this is a fundamental weakness in the putz's "every punctuation mark and capitalization tells a story" theory.

Inigo Montoya: You are using de Vattel's Defense against me, ah?
Man in Black: I thought it fitting considering the volcanic terrain.
Inigo: Naturally, you must suspect me to attack with Lujan-Defenders of Wildlife?
Man in Black: Naturally, but I find that Keyes cancels out Lujan. Don’t you?
Inigo: Unless the enemy has studied his Apuzzo… which I have.


=)) =)) =)) =))


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23525
Van Allen v NYSBOE

2012-07-09 - Opinion Dismissing Writ

No sanctions... monetary or otherwise :(

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10970
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Dodged the bullet....(NADT), Eh?

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23525
STRUNK v NYSBOE (APPEAL of Dismissal and Sanctions Order)

Quote:
ORDER on Strunk v New York State Board of Elections 10/26/2012
App Div, 2d Dept 2012 NYSlipOp 89129(U) Motion


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3935
Location: Switzerland
realist wrote:
STRUNK v NYSBOE (APPEAL of Dismissal and Sanctions Order)

Quote:
ORDER on Strunk v New York State Board of Elections 10/26/2012
App Div, 2d Dept 2012 NYSlipOp 89129(U) Motion


Three months seems quite generous considering a possible DENINED stamp.
Why does Scribd serve me with a "Pattaya Divorce Lawyer" ad when (a) I am not based at Pattaya, nor (b) have legalized my relatioship :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23525
I really have no idea what case of Strunk's this goes to but he's posted a DRAFT of what appears to be a Writ of Mandamus with the DC Court of Appeal... It's a doozie.

Quote:
DRAFT 12- PENDING -OP

________________________________________________

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________________________________________________________________
In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in essea private U.S. Citizen beneficiary
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
____________________________________________________________________
Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary withinjury in re the criminal usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and related law in etitioner’s Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order of:P
A. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft byBarack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4;

B. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S.Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013;


Etc. There is some special Strunk crunchy crazy, as usual.

If you dare, you may read it here...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ROU ... 12-Xxxx-OP

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:01 pm
Posts: 300
Do you think that Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in essea private U.S. Citizen beneficiary will have to fire President Obama again next year after the President takes his oath of office or will the 2009 dismissal be enough? Inquiring minds want to know.

_________________
When the going gets weird, the weird get going.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7766
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
I take it that Strunk's second try to file something against the NY state electors failed but I didn't find a dismissal order buried in all that pile of craziness other than the one we knew about in November.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:36 pm
Posts: 718
There's a dismissal notice (at least I think that's what it is) buried among the blank exhibits. It's Exhibit 5 on page 86, cunningly arranged between exhibits H and I. Exhibits I to Z inclusive are just blank pages.

_________________
I am not able to rightly comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a document. - Thomas Jefferson, quoting Charles Babbage on Orly Taitz's submissions.

She [Orly] names Fogbow all the time! How can Fogbow be unnamed if she keeps naming it as unnamed? That's metaphysically absurd, man! - Foggy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7766
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
rosy wrote:
There's a dismissal notice (at least I think that's what it is) buried among the blank exhibits. It's Exhibit 5 on page 86, cunningly arranged between exhibits H and I. Exhibits I to Z inclusive are just blank pages.


Yes, that is the one where Judge Schmidt raps Strunk's knuckles for trying to get around Judge Schack's order not to file any more suits against NY state officers. He tells him to go back to Judge Schack and get permission to file any more of this crap. I guess Strunk has given up on NY courts and decided to go to the DC Court of Appeals.

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Strunk in Esse©
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:25 pm
Posts: 511
Location: Under the stars
Well, I agree with Strunky Nessay when he writes:
Strunky Nessay on page 11 wrote:
That the Court at this point must admit that Declarant has a unique view and experience in regards to the role of the Jesuits in the present chain of events ongoing in the world today [...]


Yup. Strunk is unique. Uniquely stupid, uniquely wrong, uniquely vexatious, uniquely frivolous.

He's a unique idiot. I'm baffled as to how people who are so clearly insane and living on a different planet manage to function in the world of normality without coming horribly unstuck. Money probably helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 400 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 16  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], rossgw and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group