I posted a reply to Puzo's comments on "Intrepid Reporters" report on the in esse hearing.

Mario Apuzzo Comments on RC Radio’s Report on the Strunk Hearing and Gets It Wrong Again

I like this article you wrote, and the Intrepid Reporter did a good job conveying the hearing and the utter insanity of Mr. Strunk. The Judge handled it well by not getting angry at the silly kook before him.

Putz's rebuttal and comments to your article show he's lost whatever grasp he had on facts or the laws or reality. His stubborn refusal to accept or even consider the many and consistent rulings that shoot down his opinion(s) and allegations indicates a mind that is ruled by immaturity and/or madness.
Has he begun to rant like the others that every judge and clerk and official is corrupt and they are all in on the reghime's "fix", and that is the ONLY reason the birthers cases get knocked down ? That would be the icing on the crazy cake for him.

Your response to his tiny tirade is spot on.
Putz and the other birthers persist at demanding courts help them fight against their homegrown fantasies and to cater to their personal paranoia. Instead, they need to apply to other government agencies in order to address those problems.

These from your article describes all birther cases to a T.
For the life of me, I do not know why these or appropriate similar statutes are not immediately whipped out to measure each birther lawsuit, wherever it may be filed:

Thanks for the nice comments, MrBrown.

Strunk has a posting at obamaballotchallenge.com in which he says his sanctions amount to close to $500,000.

That's more likely what the cost bills of all the attorneys add up to.

I don't *think* the court has yet ruled on what he'll be responsible for, if any (unless there's a ruling attached at his posting, which I've not read).

With all the attorneys involved, and all the crap they had to file/respond to, I'd guess those are not completely unreasonable. The court will determine what *reasonable* is then issue an order.

Over the years Strunk's legal actions have been directed at the Jesuits more than at President Obama or any other politician. While his suits have all been nonsense, they have nevertheless cost the Society to defend against them. My guess is that if all those costs were included (which they are not), Strunk would be looking at sanctions well above $1,000,000.

The litigation career of Mr. Dash Colon Copyright Sign, in esse, should now be coming to a close. But if this lunatic just lives to litigate he'll simply move to another state, like New Jersey. Unfortunately for him, his vexatious litigant status will follow him and he'll be shut down again soon enough. I think the career of a really pernicious person is coming to an end. I hope the lawyers who are now submitting their cost bills take every non exempt asset of this asshole.

Whew...that's one big old bag of crazy word jumble fron Strunkie, has he been taking grammar and punctuation lessons from MOO...?

He can't even get through his own name without lots of errors. So, what did you expect from a presentation with, you know, real words?

Orly posted this gem from Strunk on her blog :

Does Strunk still have a computer? I sure hope it's not exempt from levy when he gets the attorney's fees bills.

Could he declare bankruptcy and have this discharged?

Not if it's not exempt from levy. Usually e things exempt from levy are things protected if the judgment debtor declares BK.

I take it that French is NOT one of the five languages that Orly is fluent in! That, or she is a really bad speller regardless of the language.

Just for s&g

Google search for

coup d'état (correctly spelled) gets 22,600,000 results
Orly Taitz 744,000


GET CRACKIN' GIRL!!! THEY'RE WINNING!!!!!!!

Update...

Strunk v NYSBOE - Notice of Appeal with Attachments

With only 25-30 listed issues on appeal.

I guess he figures that he can't go broker...You can't get blood out of a turnip.

Wasn't there something about "with prejudice" around here somewhere???

A 90-page notice of appeal. That's our boy in action!

He's off to one hell of a start.

Strunk in esse might as well add to the bar tab he has running. Go Chris.

Short answer: A trial judge can't preclude a party from appealing. Whether the judgment was with or without prejudice has nothing to do with a party's rights on appeal.

If you think about it, the right of appeal would be hollow if the judge whose rulings are the subject of an appeal could block the appeal by assigning prejudice. (There's a narrow exception having to do with interlocutory appeals. That is, in some instances, it is necessary to obtain leave to file an appeal before a final order has been entered.)

Thanks for the quick short answer...

There are three separate programs with Sandra Schulte. Things of note:

1. In 2008, he makes no mention of a "two citizen parent" requirement, or even "born in Kenya". He does refer to Berg's lawsuit, but he only cites Berg's claim that young Obama was stripped of his U.S. citizenship by being naturalized as an Indonesian.

2. He is a classic conspiracist as per Jonathan Kay. He believes in almost every conspiracy notion ever put forward: 9/11 Was an Inside Job, the Kennedy Assassination, WWI conspiracies, even that Islam is controlled by the Vatican! (His variant of conspiracism is that The Vatican Is Behind Everything.) And like all conspiracists, absolutely anything and everything can be incorporated into the Vast Conspiracy. The "Born in Kenya" notion is, in his theory, only a feint to distract attention from the "two-citizen parent" requirement, which even he never mentioned in 2008, despite the fact that it was well-known that Barack Obama, Sr. was a foreign student!

3. He is actually fairly well-read, but only in a shallow sense. All of his reading is done pursuant to his Vatican Conspiracy. Anything which doesn't fit is filtered out, and anything which seems to support it, however tangentially, is highlighted. He reads histories of the American Civil War in order to find out which generals were Catholics!

The videos are worth watching for anyone interested in the conspiracist mind-set. Others will probably fall asleep.

It has been more than 30 days since the hearing. I would assume all the attorneys who are seeking fees have turned in their requests by now. I would expect a ruling from Judge Schack sometime this month.