The Stoopidest Thing Taitz Has Ever Done

muldrake · **Posted:** Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:55 pm

bob wrote:

While I can't speak for SCOTUS, even in this extreme case this is unlikely. If the justice grants the stay, the clerk would then most likely call the parties and orally relay the order, certify the order for the court, enter it into the docket, and then fax the order. (And these courts have been around for ages; they have plans on how to process emergencies that come in during off-hours.)

Even state intermediate appeals courts generally have at least one judge on "emergent" duty, to deal with emergency appeals that come in at odd hours. While appeals courts generally reject these emergent appeals, since most things parties feel to be emergencies simply aren't from a legal standpoint, it is generally always possible to file something on an emergency basis. Some areas where such appeals seem more likely to succeed are things like child custody disputes where irreparable harm may actually result from an erroneous decision, and issues where the subject of controversy will literally disappear without immediate intervention, one small example being election day challenges to denials of the right to vote.

aarrgghh · **Joined:** Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:05 pm **Posts:** 1248

no matter how stoopid orly stoops, her minions eagerly follow:

Quote:

I am not going to cut her down.She strongly believes in her cause. I wish the attorneys I paid for normal BS like home closing, wills, etc, had her drive.
4 posted on July 21, 2010 4:53:20 AM EDT by Lumper20

Quote:

Quit beating up on Orly.
She is doing a hell of a lot more then you are to
get Bozo kicked out of office.
Somewhere, she may just get lucky.
5 posted on July 21, 2010 4:58:20 AM EDT by AlexW

Quote:

She obviously suspects some clerk of denying her the right to file papers. She could be right! Considering the pussy footing Gov. of Hawaii and her total support of Obama, we all have reason (and the right) to question authority.
6 posted on July 21, 2010 4:59:31 AM EDT by kitkat (OBAMA hates us. Well, maybe a LOT of Kenyans do.)

Quote:

Taitz is doing the job more Americans should be doing. It’s easy to stand on he side lines and ridicule but far tougher to defend the Constitution against a socialist regime who is illegally holding office.
16 posted on July 21, 2010 6:47:41 AM EDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! http://www.FairTaxNation.com)

plus extra-special guest-star -- the man who met the usurper-to-be, and willing to write about it for a few post-college credits -- the one-n-only racebannon!

Quote:

I would bet he doesn’t see may of the things that ar eput out as “valid” at that high level. However, KNOWING that someone caught...was it Roberts?...saying he never heard of a motion/paper that was brought to the Supremes last year January/Feb and Roberts said he never heard of it, yet for some reason, it was dismissed with all the appropriate signatures on it?

Remember, I met 0bama in 1980. I know what he said to me. If you can provide any PROOF he is an American, I’ll still call it a lie. I HEARD him tell me he was born in Kenya.
26 posted on July 21, 2010 7:25:26 AM EDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10644

Quote:

If you can provide any PROOF he is an American, I’ll still call it a lie.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of birtherism.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23530

TexasFilly wrote:

Quote:

If you can provide any PROOF he is an American, I’ll still call it a lie.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of birtherism.

Eggzactly.

Interestingly (or not perhaps) I've seen remarks like that more frequently lately. Though a few have said it in the past, they are now saying it more frequently...NOTHING will ever convince them the scary black man in THEIR White House has any right to be there...period.

elliewyatt · **Joined:** Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:31 pm **Posts:** 2675

aarrgghh wrote:

Quote:

Quit beating up on Orly.
She is doing a hell of a lot more then you are to
get Bozo kicked out of office.
Somewhere, [highlight]she may just get lucky[/highlight].
5 posted on July 21, 2010 4:58:20 AM EDT by AlexW

Isn't it established that she already did-- in the dental chair?

Plutodog · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:17 am

D'ya suppose Orly filed this most outlandish thing (if she did) because she was jealous of all the attention we've been paying to Mario et al?

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10644

realist wrote:

TexasFilly wrote:

Quote:

If you can provide any PROOF he is an American, I’ll still call it a lie.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of birtherism.

Eggzactly.

Interestingly (or not perhaps) I've seen remarks like that more frequently lately. Though a few have said it in the past, they are now saying it more frequently...NOTHING will ever convince them the scary black man in THEIR White House has any right to be there...period.

So much for Mario's argument that the Defendants/Appellees could have mitigated "damages"

aarrgghh · **Joined:** Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:05 pm **Posts:** 1248

realist wrote:

TexasFilly wrote:

Quote:

If you can provide any PROOF he is an American, I’ll still call it a lie.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of birtherism.

Eggzactly.

Interestingly (or not perhaps) I've seen remarks like that more frequently lately. Though a few have said it in the past, they are now saying it more frequently...NOTHING will ever convince them the scary black man in THEIR White House has any right to be there...period.

i remember seeing this almost a year ago:

Quote:

I just want the jerk to present his birth certificate just like the rest of us chumps have to when the law calls for it as proof of status for employment. The fact he won’t show it is enough grounds for him to be cleared out - even if, afterwards, he’s show to be a full-fledged NBC.

Simply put, zer0 refuses to comply with the U.S. Constitution, no matter his birth history.

32 posted on Sunday August 09, 00:31:55 GMT-0400 2009 by Yossarian (DRAFT BARBOUR 2012!)

Foggy · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:28 am

She put up so many posts last night, the Motion to Spank Some Evil Obot Clerks For Faking Justice Thomas' Signature got pushed back to halfway down the second page of her blog. Looks to me like she may be having second thoughts. On the bright side, she published all of LInda Starr Belcher's rambling and disjointed rant to Judge Robreno.

I love that she served "Kumar Neal Katyal, Acting Solicitor General of the United States".

That had to hurt.

Where would ol' Kumar score on Sharon Ann Moron's Whackjob Chart of Americanness?

Serving the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice was another nice touch, along with the International Criminal Bar at the Hague.

No wonder the Hague is gonna endorse RAP and Interim President Turner, after learning about Obama's many high crimes and misdemeanors. Kinda brings the whole pitcher into focus, don't it? :-k

TerribleTom · **Joined:** Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:41 pm **Posts:** 669

aarrgghh wrote:

no matter how stoopid orly stoops, her minions eagerly follow:

Quote:

I am not going to cut her down.She strongly believes in her cause. I wish the attorneys I paid for normal BS like home closing, wills, etc, had her drive.
4 posted on July 21, 2010 4:53:20 AM EDT by Lumper20

Riiight! And the next time you close on a house, make sure you retain Orly to sue everyone in sight -- the home inspector for "fraudulently" failing to pick up a leaky fumes emission hose on the furnace, the seller for inadvertantly putting their birthday in the wrong field, the lender for not returning a call right away, the surveyor for not affixing a raised seal on the plat, the title insurance company for suspiciously misspelling the seller's middle name and, of course, the settlement attorney for RICO claims since he had lunch with the real estate agent a month before closing.

Let us know how that works out for you, K?

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:13 am

I doubt that Obly has second thoughts. About anything. Among other things, such an assertion assumes that she had a first thought. Her actions are more like those of an instant reflex than of a thought-out course of action.

She and her supporters persist in thinking that something is wrong on the SCOTUS docket:

Quote:

More evidence re Scotus. Denial by Justice Thomas doesn’t show in the log of the Supreme Court. Why isn’t it there?

Posted on | July 21, 2010 | 3 Comments

Log of Orders of the SCOTUS
Wednesday, July 21, 2010 6:52 PM

To:
“Orly Taitz” <dr_taitz@yahoo.com>
Hi Orly:

Log:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orde ... court.aspx

Only two orders are listed on or around the dates of purported Thomas order:
1) http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cour ... 1610zr.pdf
2) http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cour ... 610zr1.pdf

Both of them are cases v Obama, but none of them is Rhodes v MacDonald.

In short – there is no SCOTUS order by Thomas on or about July 15-17 in the Rhodes v MacDonald case.

I expect that Orly will proceed full scream ahead in her quest to validate the signatures of Justice Thomas and, most likely, all members of SCOTUS. There is still, after all, that denial issued when the entire Court was assembled in conference, but Orly has no document with the signatures of all nine Justices.

I'm not sure how all this squares with her much earlier demand that SCOTUS recuse itself from hearing one of her cases.

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23530

Quote:

Riiight! And the next time you close on a house, make sure you retain Orly to sue everyone in sight -- the home inspector for "fraudulently" failing to pick up a leaky fumes emission hose on the furnace, the seller for inadvertantly putting their birthday in the wrong field, the lender for not returning a call right away, the surveyor for not affixing a raised seal on the plat, the title insurance company for suspiciously misspelling the seller's middle name and, of course, the settlement attorney for RICO claims since he had lunch with the real estate agent a month before closing.

Let us know how that works out for you, K?

TerribleTom... =D>

and

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10644

TerribleTom wrote:

aarrgghh wrote:

no matter how stoopid orly stoops, her minions eagerly follow:

Quote:

I am not going to cut her down.She strongly believes in her cause. I wish the attorneys I paid for normal BS like home closing, wills, etc, had her drive.
4 posted on July 21, 2010 4:53:20 AM EDT by Lumper20

Riiight! And the next time you close on a house, make sure you retain Orly to sue everyone in sight -- the home inspector for "fraudulently" failing to pick up a leaky fumes emission hose on the furnace, the seller for inadvertantly putting their birthday in the wrong field, the lender for not returning a call right away, the surveyor for not affixing a raised seal on the plat, the title insurance company for suspiciously misspelling the seller's middle name and, of course, the settlement attorney for RICO claims since he had lunch with the real estate agent a month before closing.

Let us know how that works out for you, K?

Hahahaha! I have a strong suspicion Lumper has never actually paid for an attorney in his life. There is no real property, and nothing of import to put in a will. But hey, I'm a born cynic.

verbalobe · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:24 am

Litlebritdifrnt2 wrote:

True Foggy and we win as many as we lose. But at least we do the shit right to begin with, we never lose cause we never comply with the rules. (Okay I admit one time we lost an appeal because idiot paralegal forgot to file the fucking transcript with the court of appeals, when the opinion came down and it was littered with "fails to provide any transcript evidence" you kind of start checking, and then you realise that you didn't fucking file the fucking transcript) As it was the defendant had already declared corporate bankruptcy, and was therefore piss proof. But the bottom line was I forgot to file the transcript. I will never live it down.

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:48 am

This juicy tidbit of information makes it into Orly's next filing in SCOTUS in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

Quote:

4 RESPONSES TO "MORE EVIDENCE RE SCOTUS. DENIAL BY JUSTICE THOMAS DOESN'T SHOW IN THE LOG OF THE SUPREME COURT. WHY ISN'T IT THERE?"

Quote:

1. Politijabber
July 21st, 2010 @ 8:27 pm

You do know, don’t you, that on Saturday Justice Thomas was in Sun Valley, Idaho? He was the keynote speaker at the Utah State Bar’s convention.

Let's see if she takes the bite on this one.

Quote:

Politijabber
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
July 22nd, 2010 @ 6:53 am

“All the more reason to investigate where the Liberal Justices and their Obot Clerks were on that day.”

Isn’t it obvious? They were at the Supreme Court on Saturday. I’ll bet Ruth Ginsburg is behind this. Her grandson was born in France, so she wants to make sure he can become President.

Welsh Dragon · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:11 pm

Interesting preamble to the supreme court log (my emphasis):

Quote:

The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. Such an order will, for example, deny a petition for certiorari without comment. Regularly scheduled lists of orders are issued on each Monday that the Court sits, but "miscellaneous" orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled order lists are posted on this Website on the day of their issuance, while miscellaneous orders are posted on the day of issuance or the next day.

tjh · **Joined:** Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm **Posts:** 2474

Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts
:evil:

XXX-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12440 :evil:

14 TJ Hunter
July 21st, 2010 @ 12:30 pm

Dr Taitz : Will this appear as a new docket, or will it go under one or both of your existing dockets?

By the way … I see that somebody has been changing the dates on your dockets.

2 items found for your search: taitz

Search Results:
Docket for 10A56
Title: Orly Taitz, Applicant v. Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
Orly Taitz, Applicant Orly Taitz Orly Taitz
Last Modified: 7/19/2010 1:33:52 PM

Docket for 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Orly Taitz
Last Modified: 7/17/2010 10:06:19 AM

Does this mean that someone in the court is altering your docket files?

16 dr_taitz@yahoo.com
July 21st, 2010 @ 3:46 pm

no, there were no recent modifications

realist · **Joined:** Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm **Posts:** 23530

Quote:

Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts

Well, at least it's not two suitcases full of poop.

Due to the nature of her request, however, she really should have delivered this one personally to ensure it actually gets into the hands of Chief Justice Roberts.

TexasFilly · **Joined:** Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm **Posts:** 10644

AHAHAHAHAHA tjh!

TollandRCR · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:40 pm

realist wrote:

Quote:

Motion -request for verification of signature of Justice Thomas was submitted to Chief Justice Roberts

Well, at least it's not two suitcases full of poop.

Due to the nature of her request, however, she really should have delivered this one personally to ensure it actually gets into the hands of Chief Justice Roberts.

She really should have hand-delivered a copy to each Justice, as well as copies to the clerks who are so clearly implicated, as well as copies to the Washington Conservative Examiner and the Washington Times, all with full appendices and her 55 dossiers.

Foggy · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:29 pm

Quote:

Orly will proceed full scream ahead ...

Just so I remember to steal that next chance I get. :lol:

Butterfly Bilderberg · **Posted:** Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:43 pm

Some food for thought, fed to Orly ...

Quote:

Politijabber
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
July 22nd, 2010 @ 7:41 pm

You probably already knew this, Orly, but Justice Clarence Thomas spends each summer traveling around the U.S. in his RV. He’s not even in Washington DC for the summer. Chief Justice John Roberts spends his summers kayaking. And July and August are the months when the new law clerks for the 2010 Term are being trained by outgoing clerks.

Just something to think about …

... like Pablum. :-$

bob · **Posted:** Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:22 am

From Taitz's site:

Taitz wrote:

There is a serious problem with the courts.

the same thing happened to me in the Supreme Court of Ca. I sent my docs on the 13th. they got them on 14th and the chief Judge George announced his resignation the same day. he spent the whole day giving interviews, and the next day I got a response that he denied my application. It was not signed either. The application had some 100 pages (including the exhibits) When did he have time to read it? never mind thinking about it or discussing withthe other 6 judges. I spent $590 on the application fee, and nearly 500 on printing of the books (11 of them) binding, shipping by fed ex. At the end I doubt they read one single word.

xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12509

Obama got to Chief Justice George!!!

(And, yes, $590 filing fee; didn't know about the $500 for printing and shipping.)

June bug · **Posted:** Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:38 am

aarrgghh wrote:

no matter how stoopid orly stoops, her minions eagerly follow:

Quote:

Quit beating up on Orly.
She is doing a hell of a lot more then you are to
get Bozo kicked out of office.
[highlight]Somewhere, she may just get lucky[/highlight].
5 posted on July 21, 2010 4:58:20 AM EDT by AlexW

I am reminded of one of my dad's favorite expressions, which seems particularly apropos of Orly:

Quote:

Even a blind pig gets an apple sometimes!

RTH10260 · **Posted:** Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:28 am

June bug wrote:

Quote:

Even a blind pig gets an apple sometimes!

Where's the lipstick ? :roll:

Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.

The Stoopidest Thing Taitz Has Ever Done

Who is online