Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34751 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023 ... 1391  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
It might be more accurate to substitute Tea Baggers for Republicans. Then she would be telling the truth.

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4913
Location: Glocca Morra
realist wrote:
Adding to the list of things Orly doesn't "get". :D

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=199265 :evil:

The biggest nightmare for the NBC: Bachmann/Taitz. Rachel Maddow looks like she just swallowed a rat

Posted on | July 26, 2012 | 2 Comments


Image


Just saw Lena got reminded that Rachel wins her lawsuits.

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23530
Quote:
Just saw Lena got reminded that Rachel wins her lawsuits.


yabbut, that's because of those corrupt regime judges who are obviously in the tank for the ebil left... you know, those same judges who thwart Orly and all birther "lawyers".

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 3973
Location: Southwest of down east
Quoting the pre-eminent non-parametric statistician Orly Taitz, realist wrote:
More on the Register poll, which shows 2/3 of GOP doubting Obama is telling the truth about his eligibility

Yabbut if those pollsters are so reliable, why isn't Orly on general election ballot for U.S. Senator?

I forgot; it just proves that the election was corrupt. Nevermind.

_________________
Hope springs eternal within the human uniboob. - Thomas Jefferson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 9:09 pm
Posts: 143
jtmunkus wrote:
I think Orly actually believes that after she presides over 'regime' change, she'll be empowered to file and prosecute treason complaints against her entire enemy list. The only thing holding her back now is the Obama 'regime' and its stranglehold on the Judicial Branch.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 5:50 am
Posts: 330
GreatGrey wrote:
realist wrote:
Adding to the list of things Orly doesn't "get". :D

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=199265 :evil:

The biggest nightmare for the NBC: Bachmann/Taitz. Rachel Maddow looks like she just swallowed a rat

Posted on | July 26, 2012 | 2 Comments


Image


Just saw Lena got reminded that Rachel wins her lawsuits.


Not sure what she was getting at here so I googled this and what do I find but this pic is from 2009. Does anyone have a clue as to what she's trying to say with her limited info here. I almost feel sorry for her supporters who think that Orly posts headlines from other websites and when they click on them, they get nothing but the headline, no story, just a rant by Orly in the form of an alleged headline.

Is there even a bit of truth to all of her claims of website hacking, etc. that she yells about on a weekly basis or is it just her inability to handle her website?

I was looking through some of the old crap on her website and saw this oldie but goodie. It's just more proof that she's been kloo-less since day one. I can only hope this person did not take her up on her offer to help.

Trish Hooper
April 25th, 2009 @ 12:32 am

Dr Orly Taitz, Bless you for helping to win this fight and standing up for all American citizens. The deaths of all these people cannot be coincidental. Please be careful and my prayers are with you. I am going to be studying for a BS in Criminal Justice Administration/Legal Studies this fall in a Missouri University. I am preparing to be a Paralegal. I am very interested in the law and respect it. I also love my country and fear for her. Thanks again from MO!
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
April 25th, 2009 @ 12:40 am

Trish,
let me know if you want to help with paperwork dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Orly
=)) =))

_________________
"One of the unfortunate rights in America is the right to be batshit crazy. Orly exercises that right proudly and righteously." --Circumspect, 2/28/13


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 3893
Location: Brigadoon
Occupation: Retired
realist wrote:
This one speaks for itself... liar/dumbass...

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=199364 :evil:

More on the Register poll, which shows 2/3 of GOP :^o doubting Obama is telling the truth about his eligibility

Posted on | July 26, 2012 | No Comments


Quote:
Register ‘birther’ poll results attract critics

July 26th, 2012, 10:30 am by Martin Wisckol, :roll: Politics reporter

As reported earlier, two-thirds of 199 county Republicans polled say Barack Obama might not be a natural-born citizen – and 20 percent of those are certain he’s not, according to an OC Political Pulse poll.(The number of respondents has increased a bit from the earlier poll, because of some late votes coming in.

Among the range of responses to these results, as posted on the Register’s Total Buzz politics blog, were several Republican readers who attacked the validity of the survey.


I think the magic number is 26 with an moe of 199. I could be wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4216
:twisted: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=201336 :twisted:
Quote:
Whose homeland does the Homeland Security secure? A shocking story of Jula Davis depicted in a documentary

Posted on | July 28, 2012 | No Comments

Danielle Duval
6:50 AM (46 minutes ago)

Dr Orly Taitz, Have your heard of that story: Julia Davis ? I just listened to her interview on infowars. I look for her website. It just confirmed what you have said…she found one honest judge in California. She was telling the truth since 2004. The media never reported on her unbelievable story. I am forwarding you the interview from infowar. Thanks again for everything you do. I tell everyone I meet about your unbelievable journey…searching for the truth.

http://topprioritymovie.com/legal/

:-? :-k

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:33 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19904
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Julia Davis also has her own Wikipedia page. Despite the fact she probably wrote it herself and is not notable. It should have been deleted months ago. Now that Taitz has discovered Davis I expect the Wikipedia page will be pumped up to match her new-found fame.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2530
Funny how all this took place or at least started under George Bush...

Logic and reason are not the birther's strongest assets I guess.

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19904
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
nbc wrote:
Funny how all this took place or at least started under George Bush...

Logic and reason are not the birther's strongest assets I guess.

George W. Bush's Presidency only ran from September 12, 2001 to September 15, 2008. Before then it was Clinton's fault and after then it was Obama's fault.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:38 am
Posts: 2530
Interesting how the case was settled under the Obama administration.
Before that Julia had successfully pursued a EEOC lawsuit arguing sexual harassment but the courts in 2006 and 2008 affirmed that she voluntarily resigned. The Board had refused to introduce the EEOC findings into the record and the court remanded for the board for further consideration. The board still found against Julia and the case was once again appealed

Quote:
On remand, after reviewing the EEOC final opinion for any inconsistency and considering the parties’ submissions on the issue, the Board again found that Ms. Davis’s resignation was voluntary. The Board found that the alleged sexual harassment of Ms. Davis occurred more than a year prior to her resignation and did not establish that, under the circumstances, a reasonable employee would have been compelled to resign.


and

Quote:
The Board also concluded that the involuntariness of the petitioner’s resignation was not identically before the EEOC or necessary to resolve the sexual harassment claim. Thus, the EEOC’s finding that Ms. Davis involuntarily resigned was dicta and not binding on the Board.


United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3252
JULIA DAVIS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in SF-0752-04-0760-M-1.
DECIDED: December 18, 2008
Before RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

As to the raid, I have found some interesting court documents

http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDo ... cca.htm/qx

Fascinating how things evolved ... A little spin and voila, you have a movie...

_________________
- Credimus quod credere volumus -


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5510
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
Orly haz a mad at Doc C's article on coding. Oh, and the conspiracy widens to include the woman whose 1961 birth certificate is used as a control document:

Quote:
MY ANSWER TO PRO-OBAMA SITE OBAMACONSPIRACY.ORG

snip ...

I know this woman, I met her. ... I am extremely suspicious of this woman and her certificate.I believe her certificate was a dry run by the forger to see if “his work of art” will fly. Either this woman is complicit or was manipulated and used as a tool.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19904
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Still a buffoon.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 605
Location: My Leap Chair
Butterfly Bilderberg wrote:
Orly haz a mad at Doc C's article on coding. Oh, and the conspiracy widens to include the woman whose 1961 birth certificate is used as a control document:

Quote:
MY ANSWER TO PRO-OBAMA SITE OBAMACONSPIRACY.ORG

snip ...

I know this woman, I met her. ... I am extremely suspicious of this woman and her certificate.I believe her certificate was a dry run by the forger to see if “his work of art” will fly. Either this woman is complicit or was manipulated and used as a tool.



She really has a few screws loose. Anyone who has evidence that contradicts her cockamamie theories or who does not agree with her is a criminal and a forgerer. At some point, when the bulk of the evidence and people are weighted toward the otherside and against you, a reasonable, rational person would start to question whether they were wrong. Not Orly. She justs adds them onto her ever growing list of people who are criminals. I suspect Corsi knows his evidence is bunk, which is why he trides to hide anything unfavorable. He is in this for the money and hatred of the president. Orly is fixated on her delusion and really believes she is right, and I don't think any evidence or any number of people telling her she is nuts will change that. She thinks she is Joan of Arc, who I am pretty sure was also delusional. What surprises me is the age Orly was when her delusions took root. There is no indication that she had serious fixations like this before (no news accounts, for example).

I am so glad that she doesn't live in my state.

_________________
Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious. --Oscar Wilde

P.S. IANAL and do not play one on TV (or in the courts, unlike some people).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9330
CatMe wrote:
She thinks she is Joan of Arc, who I am pretty sure was also delusional. What surprises me is the age Orly was when her delusions took root. There is no indication that she had serious fixations like this before (no news accounts, for example).

I am so glad that she doesn't live in my state.


Orly cannot seriously be compared to Joan of Arc, with the possible exception of delusion. For one thing, Joan was an actual hero and a very successful military commander. For another, Joan had an instinctive grasp of the law, which enabled her, without a legal education, to argue her inquisitors into the ground, forcing the English to try her repeatedly and, ultimately, outright frame her.

In short, Joan of Arc was a highly capable, courageous and accomplished woman.

Orly, on the other hand, is an incompetent, evil cretin.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 605
Location: My Leap Chair
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
CatMe wrote:
She thinks she is Joan of Arc, who I am pretty sure was also delusional. What surprises me is the age Orly was when her delusions took root. There is no indication that she had serious fixations like this before (no news accounts, for example).

I am so glad that she doesn't live in my state.


Orly cannot seriously be compared to Joan of Arc, with the possible exception of delusion. For one thing, Joan was an actual hero and a very successful military commander. For another, Joan had an instinctive grasp of the law, which enabled her, without a legal education, to argue her inquisitors into the ground, forcing the English to try her repeatedly and, ultimately, outright frame her.

In short, Joan of Arc was a highly capable, courageous and accomplished woman.

Orly, on the other hand, is an incompetent, evil cretin.


I have read that accounts attributing battlefield successes to Joan's military prowess are suspect and likely exaggerated, and I have read other accounts that say she was a great tactician. By all accounts, she appears relatively bright in her trial testimony (unlike Orly), the accuracy of which is debated since it is known to have been altered, but I have read that save for one brilliant OR lucky answer, she did not display a brilliant legal mind.

I bleieve she was fearless because she believed the delusion that she was invincible, and I am not sure that is truly courageous. However, I do think Orly believes she is all those things you ascribe to Joan of Arc, and I do believe Joan of Arc was delusional (you can be delusional and intelligent, so that is not contradictory) and I do believe Orly is delusional. I do not believe Orly could ever inspire people as Joan is reputed to have done. I also think Joan's delusions made her commit herself to what many felt was a noble purpose, and the record suggests no one was ever going to dissuade Joan from her belief in her reality, and I do think that is also true of Orly. Unfortunately, Orly did not become fixated on something most people could see as noble, like freeing truly oppressed people from tyranny. But I think SHE sees it that way.

_________________
Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious. --Oscar Wilde

P.S. IANAL and do not play one on TV (or in the courts, unlike some people).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:06 am
Posts: 2483
Location: Flat earth with the dragons.
Joan of Arc? =)) WEll maybe if there is a witch burnin'! =)) NADT

_________________
"QUALES ILLIC HOMUNCULI!" - laughed Nostradamus, foretelling the appearance of birthers.

"Your politics have no relation to morals."-
Niccolo Machiavelli to the Tea Party


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9330
CatMe wrote:
I have read that accounts attributing battlefield successes to Joan's military prowess are suspect and likely exaggerated, and I have read other accounts that say she was a great tactician. By all accounts, she appears relatively bright in her trial testimony (unlike Orly), the accuracy of which is debated since it is known to have been altered, but I have read that save for one brilliant OR lucky answer, she did not display a brilliant legal mind.


I will abandon this mini-threadjack, unless we want to have a Joan of Arc thread, but I will reiterate that I stand by my praise of Joan and vilification of Orly.

I will just note that to the extent the transcripts of Joan's trial were altered, they were altered by people who were motivated to alter them to disparage her, not to make her appear more intelligent. That the transcripts nevertheless show exactly the opposite is a testament to an excellent mind.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:47 pm
Posts: 998
Location: In the Situation Room monitoring Orly Taitz's judicial terrorism
Occupation: Fighting evil
Of course Orly is more like Don Quixote although she would never equate herself to him.

Don Quixote’s insanity is the subject of much controversy among literary critics. Is Don Quixote really insane, or is his behavior a conscious choice?

I think the answer, when it comes to Orly, is somewhere in between - 3/4 madness, 1/4 conscious choice. Some delusional people choose to hide their delusions because somewhere, deep inside, something tells them that there are consequences to revealing their delusions. They still believe their delusions are real, no matter what the rest of the world thinks, but make a conscious choice in order to prevent public ridicule.

Unfortunately, Orly not only is delusional but she also consciously continues to make choices every day to pursue her delusions, despite any repercussions to her dignity or reputation. Perhaps this era of blogging and finding birds of a feather on the internet has only acted to encourage and exacerbate Orly's choice.

Maybe in a different era, like during the Joan of Arc years, she would have chosen to stay silent rather than to risk being burned at the stake. Today, not only she does not risk being burned at the stake, but there are no repercussions (sanctions) to her Quixotic pursuits. Therefore, in her mind the legal system, her playground for birtherism, is really bad but not bad enough to force her to opt out of publicly pursuing her delusions.

_________________
Jihadist Orly is not just a bumbling and poorly trained judicial terrorist: She's a full blown terrorist advocating for armed insurrection and inciting violence against our President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 6626
Orly isn't insane or quixotic, she's a nasty fucking bitch who hates President Obama and will stop at nothing to smear his name. Don Quixote wasn't insane, he was a bored old romantic who had more time than good sense. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 605
Location: My Leap Chair
Mark wrote:
Of course Orly is more like Don Quixote although she would never equate herself to him.

Don Quixote’s insanity is the subject of much controversy among literary critics. Is Don Quixote really insane, or is his behavior a conscious choice?


I think Joan of Arc had delusions, but she was not insane. I get the sense she lived in the real world most of the time but had hallucinations that she believed were real, absent any other explanation in her time. I don't know about Don Quixote because I read it so long ago.

I don't think Orly is insane. I think she is delusional and ill, but I think she knows right from wrong and chooses to antagonize a lot of people. The truly insane people I have met in my life often said things that no one could interpret because they made no sense. Orly attends to her apearance, appears to hold a job, raised her kids, and people can interpret what she says even though most find her conclusions illogical and irrational. I think if she got help and got past this delusion and obsession, she would almost be normal. But she would still be arrogant and mean (though I suspect deep down she is very insecure, which is why she is so defensive and aggressive when challenged. It comes through in her moments when she seems to acknowledge the futility of her quest).

My father used to be irrationally hostile toward gay people, and no amount of arguing seemed to dissuade him of his absurd notions (though he never did anything about his dislike). Then, he divorced my stepmom, started socializing more, and realized how wrong he had been and how irrational his arguments had been. I keep thinking Orly is not so far gone that she might not wake up one day and have it click that she really has been foolish and wrong. Then again, it has already been almost 4 years and it is only getting worse!

Like what she wrote on Doc's page. That is really taking a delusion very far to imagine everyone is involved in the conspiracy. Do you suppose she thinks we are paid operatives that the president hires to discredit her? I suspect she does.

_________________
Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious. --Oscar Wilde

P.S. IANAL and do not play one on TV (or in the courts, unlike some people).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 5510
Location: You Sue-We Serve Legal Support Services, 500 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI 96813
CatMe wrote:
What surprises me is the age Orly was when her delusions took root.


Menopause. It would be tragic if this pathetic clown parading as a lawyer might have been prevented from carrying out her delusional, vexatious litigation by a daily dose of estrogen.

_________________
“I can assure you that already in the Pavlovian swamps of the nutso right, the glands are swelling. Theirs is a different planet from the one you and I inhabit. ” - Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Michael Tomasky, May 12, 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9330
Mark wrote:
Of course Orly is more like Don Quixote although she would never equate herself to him.


Now I find myself defending a fictional character from unwarranted comparisons to Orly. Judge Lamberth's comments about tilting at windmills aside, I must state that Quixote's motivations were honorable, even though he was insane.

Orly is just plain EVIL. A comparison to Quixote is an insult to Quixote and an unwarranted compliment to a villain.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5944
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
kimba wrote:
Don Quixote wasn't insane, he was a bored old romantic who had more time than good sense. :lol:

Stop makin' fun of me! :lol:

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34751 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023 ... 1391  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Reeeko and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group