It might be more accurate to substitute Tea Baggers for Republicans. Then she would be telling the truth.

Just saw Lena got reminded that Rachel wins her lawsuits.

yabbut, that's because of those corrupt regime judges who are obviously in the tank for the ebil left... you know, those same judges who thwart Orly and all birther "lawyers".

Yabbut if those pollsters are so reliable, why isn't Orly on general election ballot for U.S. Senator?

I forgot; it just proves that the election was corrupt. Nevermind.

Not sure what she was getting at here so I googled this and what do I find but this pic is from 2009. Does anyone have a clue as to what she's trying to say with her limited info here. I almost feel sorry for her supporters who think that Orly posts headlines from other websites and when they click on them, they get nothing but the headline, no story, just a rant by Orly in the form of an alleged headline.

Is there even a bit of truth to all of her claims of website hacking, etc. that she yells about on a weekly basis or is it just her inability to handle her website?

I was looking through some of the old crap on her website and saw this oldie but goodie. It's just more proof that she's been kloo-less since day one. I can only hope this person did not take her up on her offer to help.

Trish Hooper
April 25th, 2009 @ 12:32 am

Dr Orly Taitz, Bless you for helping to win this fight and standing up for all American citizens. The deaths of all these people cannot be coincidental. Please be careful and my prayers are with you. I am going to be studying for a BS in Criminal Justice Administration/Legal Studies this fall in a Missouri University. I am preparing to be a Paralegal. I am very interested in the law and respect it. I also love my country and fear for her. Thanks again from MO!
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
April 25th, 2009 @ 12:40 am

Trish,
let me know if you want to help with paperwork dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Orly

I think the magic number is 26 with an moe of 199. I could be wrong.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=201336

Julia Davis also has her own Wikipedia page. Despite the fact she probably wrote it herself and is not notable. It should have been deleted months ago. Now that Taitz has discovered Davis I expect the Wikipedia page will be pumped up to match her new-found fame.

Funny how all this took place or at least started under George Bush...

Logic and reason are not the birther's strongest assets I guess.

George W. Bush's Presidency only ran from September 12, 2001 to September 15, 2008. Before then it was Clinton's fault and after then it was Obama's fault.

Interesting how the case was settled under the Obama administration.
Before that Julia had successfully pursued a EEOC lawsuit arguing sexual harassment but the courts in 2006 and 2008 affirmed that she voluntarily resigned. The Board had refused to introduce the EEOC findings into the record and the court remanded for the board for further consideration. The board still found against Julia and the case was once again appealed



and



United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3252
JULIA DAVIS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in SF-0752-04-0760-M-1.
DECIDED: December 18, 2008
Before RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

As to the raid, I have found some interesting court documents

http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDo ... cca.htm/qx

Fascinating how things evolved ... A little spin and voila, you have a movie...

Orly haz a mad at Doc C's article on coding. Oh, and the conspiracy widens to include the woman whose 1961 birth certificate is used as a control document:

Still a buffoon.

She really has a few screws loose. Anyone who has evidence that contradicts her cockamamie theories or who does not agree with her is a criminal and a forgerer. At some point, when the bulk of the evidence and people are weighted toward the otherside and against you, a reasonable, rational person would start to question whether they were wrong. Not Orly. She justs adds them onto her ever growing list of people who are criminals. I suspect Corsi knows his evidence is bunk, which is why he trides to hide anything unfavorable. He is in this for the money and hatred of the president. Orly is fixated on her delusion and really believes she is right, and I don't think any evidence or any number of people telling her she is nuts will change that. She thinks she is Joan of Arc, who I am pretty sure was also delusional. What surprises me is the age Orly was when her delusions took root. There is no indication that she had serious fixations like this before (no news accounts, for example).

I am so glad that she doesn't live in my state.

Orly cannot seriously be compared to Joan of Arc, with the possible exception of delusion. For one thing, Joan was an actual hero and a very successful military commander. For another, Joan had an instinctive grasp of the law, which enabled her, without a legal education, to argue her inquisitors into the ground, forcing the English to try her repeatedly and, ultimately, outright frame her.

In short, Joan of Arc was a highly capable, courageous and accomplished woman.

Orly, on the other hand, is an incompetent, evil cretin.

I have read that accounts attributing battlefield successes to Joan's military prowess are suspect and likely exaggerated, and I have read other accounts that say she was a great tactician. By all accounts, she appears relatively bright in her trial testimony (unlike Orly), the accuracy of which is debated since it is known to have been altered, but I have read that save for one brilliant OR lucky answer, she did not display a brilliant legal mind.

I bleieve she was fearless because she believed the delusion that she was invincible, and I am not sure that is truly courageous. However, I do think Orly believes she is all those things you ascribe to Joan of Arc, and I do believe Joan of Arc was delusional (you can be delusional and intelligent, so that is not contradictory) and I do believe Orly is delusional. I do not believe Orly could ever inspire people as Joan is reputed to have done. I also think Joan's delusions made her commit herself to what many felt was a noble purpose, and the record suggests no one was ever going to dissuade Joan from her belief in her reality, and I do think that is also true of Orly. Unfortunately, Orly did not become fixated on something most people could see as noble, like freeing truly oppressed people from tyranny. But I think SHE sees it that way.

Joan of Arc? WEll maybe if there is a witch burnin'! NADT

I will abandon this mini-threadjack, unless we want to have a Joan of Arc thread, but I will reiterate that I stand by my praise of Joan and vilification of Orly.

I will just note that to the extent the transcripts of Joan's trial were altered, they were altered by people who were motivated to alter them to disparage her, not to make her appear more intelligent. That the transcripts nevertheless show exactly the opposite is a testament to an excellent mind.

Of course Orly is more like Don Quixote although she would never equate herself to him.

Don Quixote’s insanity is the subject of much controversy among literary critics. Is Don Quixote really insane, or is his behavior a conscious choice?

I think the answer, when it comes to Orly, is somewhere in between - 3/4 madness, 1/4 conscious choice. Some delusional people choose to hide their delusions because somewhere, deep inside, something tells them that there are consequences to revealing their delusions. They still believe their delusions are real, no matter what the rest of the world thinks, but make a conscious choice in order to prevent public ridicule.

Unfortunately, Orly not only is delusional but she also consciously continues to make choices every day to pursue her delusions, despite any repercussions to her dignity or reputation. Perhaps this era of blogging and finding birds of a feather on the internet has only acted to encourage and exacerbate Orly's choice.

Maybe in a different era, like during the Joan of Arc years, she would have chosen to stay silent rather than to risk being burned at the stake. Today, not only she does not risk being burned at the stake, but there are no repercussions (sanctions) to her Quixotic pursuits. Therefore, in her mind the legal system, her playground for birtherism, is really bad but not bad enough to force her to opt out of publicly pursuing her delusions.

Orly isn't insane or quixotic, she's a nasty fucking bitch who hates President Obama and will stop at nothing to smear his name. Don Quixote wasn't insane, he was a bored old romantic who had more time than good sense.

I think Joan of Arc had delusions, but she was not insane. I get the sense she lived in the real world most of the time but had hallucinations that she believed were real, absent any other explanation in her time. I don't know about Don Quixote because I read it so long ago.

I don't think Orly is insane. I think she is delusional and ill, but I think she knows right from wrong and chooses to antagonize a lot of people. The truly insane people I have met in my life often said things that no one could interpret because they made no sense. Orly attends to her apearance, appears to hold a job, raised her kids, and people can interpret what she says even though most find her conclusions illogical and irrational. I think if she got help and got past this delusion and obsession, she would almost be normal. But she would still be arrogant and mean (though I suspect deep down she is very insecure, which is why she is so defensive and aggressive when challenged. It comes through in her moments when she seems to acknowledge the futility of her quest).

My father used to be irrationally hostile toward gay people, and no amount of arguing seemed to dissuade him of his absurd notions (though he never did anything about his dislike). Then, he divorced my stepmom, started socializing more, and realized how wrong he had been and how irrational his arguments had been. I keep thinking Orly is not so far gone that she might not wake up one day and have it click that she really has been foolish and wrong. Then again, it has already been almost 4 years and it is only getting worse!

Like what she wrote on Doc's page. That is really taking a delusion very far to imagine everyone is involved in the conspiracy. Do you suppose she thinks we are paid operatives that the president hires to discredit her? I suspect she does.

Menopause. It would be tragic if this pathetic clown parading as a lawyer might have been prevented from carrying out her delusional, vexatious litigation by a daily dose of estrogen.

Now I find myself defending a fictional character from unwarranted comparisons to Orly. Judge Lamberth's comments about tilting at windmills aside, I must state that Quixote's motivations were honorable, even though he was insane.

Orly is just plain EVIL. A comparison to Quixote is an insult to Quixote and an unwarranted compliment to a villain.

Stop makin' fun of me!