got several e-mails, where I was told that ORYR (supposedly Bob Nelson) and Sam Sewell are promoting a video clip with a recorded phone call from Larry Kleyman. In this phone call Kleyman is saying that in a case of Mike Voeltz, for which he now substituted as an attorney, discovery is under way and he can do it immediately. He said something afterwards that he needs to wait for something else, but I could not hear well the recording and I am not sure what was this something else for which he needs to wait for.

He did say that discovery is under way and they can do it immediately. Here is an explanation again. When a party files a case, they need to serve a complaint. Then they need to wait typically 30-60 days depending on jurisdiction and the type of the defendant for the defense to respond. If the defense files an answer, discovery can start. In Obama eligibility cases for the last 4 years the defense typically did not file an answer, but rather a motion to dismiss, saying that the case has no merit. When a party files a motion to dismiss, you cannot do discovery: you cannot depose them, you cannot subpoena a document, you cannot do interrogatories. Motion to dismiss is filed in order to protect the parties from discovery, for the parties not to have to appear in depositions. In over a 100 eligibility cases filed, motions to dismiss were granted and there was never any discovery.

I got a copy of the docket of the case of Mike Voeltz, where Larry Kleyman is an attorney. They filed their first amended complaint. I do not know, whether they served the defense with this complaint. I did not see proof of service yet. After the defense is served, you have to wait for the defense to respond. Most probably they will file a motion to dismiss. As I said, most of those motions were granted and there is a 99% chance that this motion to dismiss will be granted as they were granted in most cases and no discovery will ever be done in that case.So, somebody needs to ask Larry Kleyman, why is he saying that the discovery in that case is under way and he can do it immediately? On what basis?

[...]

My case in Mississippi was filed two months ago. Originally the defense filed motions to dismiss. I responded to those motions. Either the defense felt that the motions to dismiss will be denied or most probably they got wind of me getting ready to file an amended complaint with RICO causes of action, and they changed their strategy and filed an answer in order to try to limit the case to the original causes of action and avoid civil RICO. I filed RICO anyways. An actual answer was filed by both the attorney General of Mississippi on behalf of the Secretary of State of Mississippi and on behalf of the Democratic party of Mississippi. This is the difference between my case in MS and Kleyman’s case and a couple of other cases.

Much more at the link. Bascially, Orly's pissed at WND/Corsi, et al. cuz they are promoting everyone's cases except hers and are trying to syphon off 2 million birfer bucks. She talks about other campaigns to raise money by WND and WTF happened to it? What was done/accomplished.

And she spent 6k on her "fliers" and getting them out to 40 meeeelyon people and it's all there about Obama's fraudgate-ness.

Send money to Orly... NOT TO WND!!

I follow WND and I fail to understand why so much coverage is given to Sheriff Joe and so little given to you. As far as I can see,what the Cold Posse has done is simply repackage evidence against Obama that you unearthed repackaged from other birthers a long time ago.

Taitz needs to notch up the crazy a bit in her next set of filings to get the attention focused back on her.

:evil: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=44963

Who knew there was a Refugee Exception to Article II of the Consternation? I can almost see Scalia, Thomas and Scalito collaborating on the opinion.

Taitz needs to notch up the crazy a bit in her next set of filings to get the attention focused back on her.

Hee Hee Hee, she did with the move back to Mississippi letter.

You asked, she delivered.

So, who will reply to protest at removal?

Lady Liberty must be cooking up something good. Or else she's screeched out after her "Unlawful Removal" letter. I'm thinking it's the former, she's never this quiet for very long...

Linda M.
April 25th, 2012 @ 7:00 pm

Orly I didn’t know there was an exception to the two-citizen-parent rule for refugees. I’m glad you clarified that.


orly taitz
April 26th, 2012 @ 6:43 am

there is no official exception, the courts are simply refusing to take up this issue

Don’t donate one cent to any campaign of any politician until they demand criminal prosecution of Obama for elections fraud and use of forged documents

Posted on | April 26, 2012 | No Comments

Dear Doctor Coburn,
I have just received a copy of a letter you are reported to have sent to a constituent containing the following paragraphs:



I am sorry, Doctor. Of course Sheriff Arpaio could NOT state that Obama was ineligible as that is not HIS job. But he can, AND DID, prove that the documents that Obama is using to “prove” his eligibility ARE FRAUDULENT! Naturally Obama would be smart enough to not have HIS “fingerprints” on that document!
How in Heaven’s name can you “prove” a point on FALSE information? The FACT that Obama/Soetoro has spent a reported TWO MILLION dollars hiding his past appears to have absolutely no bearing on your thought processes. IF he HAD a valid Hawaiian birth certificate, a TEN DOLLAR phone call and an equal clerical fee would have prevented ANY of this.

I hardly consider the fact that Mr. Obama/Soetoro exploited a loophole in our system (which after all was founded by people who realized our experiment in Liberty would ONLY work with people OF ETHICS!) whereby Nancy Pelosi lied to the States and the State officials failed to exercise due diligence, followed by a COMPLETE surrender of responsibilities in the Senate to see that the Constitution was being followed.
I also note a COMPLETE LACK of ANY attempt by the Senate, or Congress in general, to initiate ANY legislation to see that such a travesty WILL NOT BE REPEATED!
No, Doctor, this can NOT be laid off on the individual States, there is MORE than enough blame to go around, and it does NOT lie with those of us who have been complaining to our elected officials for some FOUR YEARS NOW!

Sincerely,
Richard H. Irish
Edmond

How in Heaven’s name can you “prove” a point on FALSE information?

Sincerely,
Richard H. Irish
Edmond

My dad's 84 and he's proud as hell about my anti-birfing. He wants to live long enough to cast another vote for Obama, and I believe he will do just that.

So score one for sane geezers, too also.

Latest GoVote.com Dr. Orly Taitz approval -50%, Senator Diane Feinstein approval only 41%. Dr. Orly Taitz is ahead of Senator Feinstein by 9% in approval rating

Posted on | April 26, 2012 | No Comments

Not only does every vote count, but every vote seems to be swinging the results by more than 2%.

Implies 50-100 self-selected voters. I'd do my patriotic duty, but it requires registration.