So the next time Orly gets a speeding ticket she's gonna give the Judge a dvd?

Boy she really has a way with words duddun't she?

Something along the lines of "I find you in contempt, here's your fine" I suspect.

I just LOVE Orly's new idea! This will work out great.

Just have to do a look up for some of these publicly traded companies that own prisons.

Not prosecuted for contempt of court? No, not showing up was contempt of O'rly and O'rly Law. Not the same thing. The FM's may talk big about not showing up and blaming it on Obama, but I don't think anyone is stupid enough to actually put themselves at risk. Unless it's someone like the Fitzcommander who has totally lost it.

FIFY.

Yup, Orlylaw makes perfect sense. If you send someone else to court with a DVD instead of going yourself, here's what happens:

1. If the someone else is not a lawyer, the someone else can't speak to the judge on your behalf. Other than the poor spectators sitting next to this special someone, no one in the courtroom will hear the brilliant equal protection argument.

2. Meanwhile, the calendar is called. If the missing party is a civil defendant in small claims, the case will go on without them and they will lose the case. If it is a traffic case, a bench warrant will be issued for their arrest.

3. If the special someone makes a scene, they can end up in the pokey too, for contempt of court.

So far, Taitz has fought off disbarment. But maybe she's right and this thing will go viral in California. Maybe she can claim credit for that. And maybe those Cali folks who lost cases, money and liberty will be viewed by the State Bar as clients who have been actually harmed by her idiotic crusade.

Yeah, I know. Any day now.

Suggestion, hell, that looks like she is offering legal advice to people.

Silly question #1983: Is it ethical for a lawyer to provoke or encourage breaking the law or civil disobedience? I can see defending it afterwards but not actively promoting it beforehand. One could look at it as a way to create business for one's own purposes and benefit.

No. It is extremely unethical and in a jurisdiction that actually enforced ethics rules, could get a lawyer disciplined or disbarred. It is arguable that providing advice on how best to engage in civil disobedience is not itself unethical, especially if it is connected to a challenge to the constitutionality of a statute, but that is a different issue. Orly is not doing that. What she is doing is giving incompetent, horrible legal advice that could get any fool dumb enough to follow Orly's advice in jail or, at the very least, lose them their case.

But then that's Orly, the most abject failure in the history of law.

If someone was stupid enough to follow Orly's advice. How long after they are released from jail can they sue for the legal equivalent of malpractice/bad legal advice? Look at the stock brokers. If they lose the client's money on clearly a loser, they may be liable.

I think a fool who followed Orly's advice would probably be screwed, at least in the absence of a retainer agreement of some kind. The question, I think, would be whether anyone could reasonably rely on such advice, and I don't think anyone could reasonably rely on the ravings of an obvious blithering cretin.

Note, the possibility of liability for giving bad legal advice is why most lawyers either will not give legal advice at all over the Internet or will put a half-dozen disclaimers on anything that even looks like it might be legal advice. Orly, perversely, is probably somewhat shielded from such liability by the fact that her statements are so clearly blisteringly stupid that nobody in their right mind would take them as advice from a competent lawyer.

That's a separate question, though, from whether she could be punished for encouraging such behavior, and I think she could be punished and would be by a functioning bar association.

Thank you.

I see that Orly and her husband are plaintiffs in a breach of contract/warranty case in Orange County. She should try her new civil disobedience strategy with that case and see if it gets the usurper out of office.

Link, please, to juicy lawsuit details?

I just know what I can see for free from the Orange County Courts online database, case number 30-2011-00518554-CU-BC-CJC. It was filed in October. It appears to be construction-related and it must be a mess because there are a dozen or so defendants and cross defendants. Oh, and there's a hearing scheduled for next Monday.

Next Monday? isn't Orly supposed to be in MS?

You think Orange County could schedule something for April 17th???

Yeah, why won't O'rly be there defending Yosi's company and saving him some money?

Oh wait .....

Defendant Lev Amusin Construction, with a host of cross-defendants that look like construction trade companies. Renovation job gone sour?

Orly doesn't play well with others. Is there anything she's involved in that doesn't end badly or in court? Is Yosi just as bad?

Birthers will try to employ the Empty Chair maneuver to every court hearing everywhere, chanting "Sheriff Joe !!" and waving their autographed copy of Orly's Greatest Failure under the hearing officer's nose.
They will get their netherbums flayed raw by magistrates. That's some smart legal advice, Dr. Taitz.
I hope they all take it up.

I think Yosi has enough common sense to use Real Lawyers^tm. The CEL suit being one such instance.

The OC court has made recent changes that make the online info nearly indecipherable, but I do not think that Yosi has an attorney working on this case. I haven't paid for the pleadings, but it looks to me like he and the missus filed with the purported dentist taking on the legal work.

There is only one participant identified as an attorney and it looks to me like they work for the
primary defendant, a general contractor who then turned around and cross-complained against a slew of subcontractors.

The initial case management conference was continued at least twice while they sort out who is who and who has been served. But eventually most of these construction cases end up in the OC's special "complex litigation" department. If you think Orly Taitz is a legal wiz, wait until you see her in that venue.

This is that gathering that Rudy over at LoneStar1776 is putting together. Says he did it at the behest of Pasture Manning.

he hasn't placed any update videos on YouTube, so who knows how many people will be there.