Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 204 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next   
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
Quote:
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-56164 Docketed: 07/14/2011
Nature of Suit: 4320 Assault, Libel, and Slander
Lisa Liberi, et al v. Orly Taitz, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana
Fee Status: Due

Case Type Information:
1) civil
2) private
3) null

Originating Court Information:
District: 0973-8 : 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW
Court Reporter: Blanca Aguilar, Official Court Reporter
Trial Judge: Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge
Date Filed: 03/29/2011
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/13/2011 07/13/2011

07/14/2011 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: [highlight]Fee due[/highlight] from Appellant Orly Taitz on [highlight]07/28/2011[/highlight]. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/21/2011. Transcript ordered by 08/12/2011. Transcript due 11/10/2011. [highlight]Appellant Orly Taitz opening brief due 12/20/2011[/highlight]. [highlight]Appellee[/highlight] Philip J. Berg, Appellee Go Excel Global, Appellee Lisa Liberi, Appellee Lisa M. Ostella and Appellee The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due [highlight]01/19/2012[/highlight]. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7819638] (FB)


Is it at all likely the Ninth will consolidate Liberi v Taitz and Liberi v DOFF appeals?

Quote:
11-56079
Lisa Liberi, et al v. Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 06/27/2011 Orly Taitz 07/13/2011 16:33:47 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW
U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana

11-56164
Lisa Liberi, et al v. Orly Taitz, et al 07/14/2011 Orly Taitz 07/14/2011 10:01:05 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW
U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9168
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Quote:
Is it at all likely the Ninth will consolidate Liberi v Taitz and Liberi v DOFF appeals?


More than likely. (So the threads should eventually be merged.)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:51 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
07/17/2011 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822563] (OT)

07/17/2011 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822566] (OT)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2474
Quote:
Additional information might include interest in including this case in the mediation program, the case’s settlement history, issues beyond the litigation that the parties might address in a settlement context, or future events that might affect the parties’ willingness or ability to mediate the case.


Then again, it might not.

Edit : http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation/mediation_b.php

Quote:
B. What Makes A Case A Good Candidate for Appellate Mediation?

In determining whether a particular case is appropriate for mediation, counsel, the parties, and the mediator will consider many factors, including the following
:

No, No, Nope, ABSOLUTELY NOT, You must be Kidding .....

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9168
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Taitz wrote:
Apparently there was a misunderstanding in regards to the Appeal in question

The appeal involves 2 entities "Defend Our Freedoms Foundation" where Orly Taitz is the president and Orly Taitz as an individual. Both entities were supposed to be part of one appeal, however 2 separate appeal numbers were assigned and separate schedules were assigned. I am asking to join both appeals 11-56079 and 11-56164 and issue one schedule. [highlight]I am also asking for one appeal fee[/highlight].

Consolidating the appeals is not a problem. But there was no "misunderstanding": You, Taitz, filed a NOA without first consulting counsel for the other defendants, forcing them to file another one.

Teamwork!
:-bd

And the letter asking for consolidation doesn't go to the mediation unit!

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19948
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
How many mistakes so far for a simple notice of appeal?

I thought there was only 1 way a lawyer could screw up a notice of appeal.

Nope.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9168
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
Taitz wrote:
Defendant, Defend OurFreedoms Foundations, allegedly maintains a website that has publicized public information regarding Plaintiffs, including information pertaining to Lisa Liberi's criminal convictions, and a dispute between Lisa Ostella and Defend Our FreedomsFoundation. Plaintiffs have accused Defendant of violating their rights to privacy and defamation.

1. Taitz's site is registered to Taitz; DOFF is not the registrant.
2. "Allegedly maintains"? You, DOFF's "president," doesn't know if it maintains a website?
3. "rights to privacy and defamation"??!? (There is a right to defamation?)

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:52 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
Docket fee or airfare to HI? 8> :lol:

New Docket Entry...

Quote:
07/18/2011 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due. [7824110] (TSP)


Quote:
Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant
shall: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) pay
$455.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and
provide proof of payment to this court; or (3) otherwise show cause why the appeal
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of a motion to proceed
in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit
Rule 27-11. Any motion to proceed in forma pauperis must include a financial
declaration such as the attached Form 4.

If appellant fails to comply with this order, this appeal will be dismissed
automatically by the Clerk for failure to prosecute

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:53 pm
Posts: 12883
Location: location, location
Occupation: Ruler of the Intarwebz
Oh, cool. Orly learned a new legal term.

Yeah, Orly, you should definitely file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Go for it, girlfriend.

_________________
... then one day I found some birthers on my planet. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 4917
Location: Glocca Morra
Foggy wrote:
Oh, cool. Orly learned a new legal term.

Yeah, Orly, you should definitely file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Go for it, girlfriend.


Hello Merooooni!

_________________
"What's it like being an atheist? It's like being the only sober person in a car full of drunks, and they refuse to let you drive." Thomas Jefferson

Birtherism is so ridiculous that I no longer feel obligated to treat proponents w/slightest degree of respect or civility


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
Just FYI the Ninth Circuit Docket now reads...

Quote:
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-56079 Docketed: 06/27/2011
Nature of Suit: 4320 Assault, Libel, and Slander
Lisa Liberi, et al v. [highlight]Defend Our Freedoms Foundation[/highlight]
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana
Fee Status: Paid
Case Type Information:
1) civil
2) private
3) null
Originating Court Information:
District: 0973-8 : 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW
Court Reporter: Blanca Aguilar, Official Court Reporter
Trial Judge: Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge
Date Filed: 03/29/2011
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
06/14/2011 06/15/2011 06/27/2011 06/27/2011
06/28/2011 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2011. Transcript ordered by 07/27/2011. Transcript due 10/25/2011. Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. opening brief due 12/05/2011. Appellee Philip J. Berg, Appellee Go Excel Global, Appellee Lisa Liberi, Appellee Lisa M. Ostella and Appellee The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due 01/03/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7799772] (JN)

07/13/2011 2 Mail returned on 07/13/2011 addressed to Jayson Q. Marasigan, Esquire for Orly Taitz, re: Case Opening Material. Resending to: Suite 300, 23041 Avenida de la Carlota, Laguna Hills, CA 92653. [7819037] (JN)

07/17/2011 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822562]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached Service list. Resent NDA. 07/18/2011 by TW] (OT)

07/17/2011 4 COURT DELETED ENTRY : Attached service list to correct entry above [3]. Original text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822565] (OT)


AND

Quote:
Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-56164 Docketed: 07/14/2011
Nature of Suit: 4320 Assault, Libel, and Slander
Lisa Liberi, et al v.[highlight]Orly Taitz, et al[/highlight]
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Santa Ana
Fee Status: Paid
Case Type Information:
1) civil
2) private
3) null
Originating Court Information:
District: 0973-8 : 8:11-cv-00485-AG-AJW
Court Reporter: Blanca Aguilar, Official Court Reporter
Trial Judge: Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge
Date Filed: 03/29/2011
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/13/2011 07/13/2011
07/14/2011 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Orly Taitz on 07/28/2011. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/21/2011. Transcript ordered by 08/12/2011. Transcript due 11/10/2011. Appellant Orly Taitz opening brief due 12/20/2011. Appellee Philip J. Berg, Appellee Go Excel Global, Appellee Lisa Liberi, Appellee Lisa M. Ostella and Appellee The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due 01/19/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7819638] (FB)

07/17/2011 2 COURT DELETED ENTRY. Correct entry below: [6]. Original text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822563] (OT)

07/17/2011 3 COURT DELETED ENTRY. Correct entry below: [6].Original text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/17/2011. [7822566] (OT)

07/18/2011 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due. [7824110] (TSP)

07/20/2011 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 455.00 Date paid: 07/18/2011. [7826824] (BY)

07/22/2011 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Orly Taitz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/22/2011. [7829941] (PC)


As of today, at least, there's been no consolidation... nor a request for one (at least on the dockets)... briefing schedule is different for each.

I would expect the Ninth to consolidate, but...

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
"New"/Updated Docket Entries...

Quote:
08/30/2011 7 Received Orly Taitz, Inc. letter dated 08/26/2011 re: Request to correct docket to reflect that ORly Taitz, Inc. is NOT an Appellant. [7877532] [11-56079, 11-56164] (RL)

09/02/2011 8 Received District Court notice regarding NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error docket entry 289 erroneously reflects the incorrect defendant Orly Taitz, Inc. Docket entry 289 has been modified to reflect defendant Orly Taitz. [7883303] (RL)

09/07/2011 9 Case rejected from Circuit Mediation Program. [7883939] [11-15151, 11-15383, 11-16186, 11-16107, 11-16254, 11-16286, 11-16362, 11-16401, 11-16494, 11-16503, 11-16632, 11-16754, 11-16813, 11-16814, 11-16827, 11-35193, 11-35368, 11-55483, 11-55493, 11-55497, 11-55503, 11-55508, 11-55536, 11-55577, 11-55592, 11-55796, 11-56023, 11-56079, 11-56121, 11-56126, 11-56164, 11-56166, 11-56200, 11-56244, 11-56288, 11-60043, 11-71785] (SB)

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:13 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
LIBERI v DOF(s)F (NINTH CIRCUIT)

New Docket Entries...

Quote:
11/21/2011 8 14 day oral extension by phone of time to file Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. brief. Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. opening brief due 12/19/2011. Appellees Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Lisa Liberi, Lisa M. Ostella, The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due 01/17/2012. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the appellee brief. [7974559] (LN)

11/21/2011 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. Correspondence: Notice of Extention. Date of service: 11/21/2011 [7974682]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected document. Resent NDA. 11/25/2011 by GD] (OT)


In LIBERI v TAITZ (NINTH CIRCUIT) the briefing shedule remains...

Quote:
07/14/2011 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Orly Taitz on 07/28/2011. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/21/2011. Transcript ordered by 08/12/2011. Transcript due 11/10/2011. Appellant Orly Taitz opening brief due 12/20/2011. Appellee Philip J. Berg, Appellee Go Excel Global, Appellee Lisa Liberi, Appellee Lisa M. Ostella and Appellee The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due 01/19/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [7819638] (FB)


So two briefs for Orly within a of day of each other. No problem, I'm sure, as it's merely a cut and paste job. :P

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7138
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
Has MommaE been dropped from the suit?

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:25 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
kate520 wrote:
Has MommaE been dropped from the suit?


Following the severing of the cases to CA and TX she was not a party to the CA suit.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 2474
Quote:
11/21/2011 8 14 day oral extension by phone of time to file Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. brief. Appellant Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc. opening brief due 12/19/2011. Appellees Philip J. Berg, Go Excel Global, Lisa Liberi, Lisa M. Ostella, The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg answering brief due 01/17/2012. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the appellee brief. [7974559] (LN)


I guess she's just been too busy with her (soon-to-be-ruled) frivolous filings to worry about losing her house and all.

(Somehow I hadn't noticed this one ... v DOFF and v All The Oblies, Oracle etc etc ...)

_________________
Don't pee in a tree without a TJ Hunter www.tjhunters.com)
Fog-doe 1-909 REEKO subpoenas should be properly served on Blunt Force Donato
Feel free to copy/republish anything I post, with (tjh and/or tfb) or without attribution
Moderators : feel free to delete anything that offends/provides any assistance to the enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7138
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
Thanks, realist.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 7:33 pm
Posts: 3497
:o

_________________
"What are you talking about, 99? We have to shoot and kill and destroy - we represent everything that's wholesome and good in the world." - Maxwell Smart
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 10983
Location: Stalag 13 Okanagan, WA 98840
Occupation: Drone Maintenance Officer - FAA Licensed and Certified "We Fix Drones©" Call (206) 622-0460 to schedule routine maintenance or repair.
Orly's got lots of irons in the fire. Which one will burn her first?

_________________
Image ImageImage

You can follow the action, which gets you good pictures.
You can follow your instincts, which'll probably get you in trouble.

Or... you can follow the money...
which nine times out of ten will get you closer to the truth.
"The Two Jakes"


Remember, Orly NEVAH disappoints!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5955
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
SuEdB wrote:
Orly's got lots of irons in the fire. Which one will burn her first?

She needs a helper. What happened to her other one? That one wrote dynamic briefs.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:56 pm
Posts: 9362
ZekeB wrote:
SuEdB wrote:
Orly's got lots of irons in the fire. Which one will burn her first?

She needs a helper. What happened to her other one? That one wrote dynamic briefs.


She had enough of his dynamic briefs in the Dental Chair of Luurve.

_________________
L—d! said my mother, what is all this story about? — A Cock and a Bull, said Yorick — And one of the best of its kind I ever heard. -- Sterne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 5955
Location: North of Eastern Midwest University
Occupation: Spark Chaser
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
She had enough of his dynamic briefs in the Dental Chair of Luurve.

He was wearing briefs at the time? That goes against the grain of my way of doing things.

_________________
Image Image x 9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 7502
Location: Outa da doghaus and I ain't goin' back!
Occupation: Arf! Arf! Arooooooooooo! (Get that damned kitty!)
ZekeB wrote:
A Legal Lohengrin wrote:
She had enough of his dynamic briefs in the Dental Chair of Luurve.

He was wearing briefs at the time? That goes against the grain of my way of doing things.

:shock: I ain't even going to ask. :-? So don't tell! =;

_________________
  • I know that there are no limits to which the powers of privilege will not go to keep the workers in slavery.
  • My friends, it is solidarity of labor we want. We do not want to find fault with each other, but to solidify our forces and say to each other: “We must be together; our masters are joined together and we must do the same thing.”
  • Pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living.
—Mother Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23557
New Docket Entry...

Quote:
12/19/2011 10 Submitted (ECF) Opening brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Orly Taitz. Date of service: 12/19/2011. [8005455] (KS)


link shortly

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19948
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
I can't wait to see Orly Taitz's exposition on C.C.P. sec. 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute). It's an area I have litigated quite a bit in the trial courts and on appeal. I can hardly wait to get the new insights that Taitz will provide, and the clear explanation of why the trial judge was wrong.

(Quite frankly, she should have won her motion on a couple of the claims. But Taitz completely screwed up the motion, so it's probably 80-20 against her getting a reversal.)

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 204 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group