Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
She made Berg the victim?

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 2120
Location: Philadelphia, PA
He's no victim. When was it that she started posting the contact info for the Disciplinary Board at her house of crazy?

_________________
"I believe that 90% of the things alleged in the complaint didn't happen. But that's not going to make following this lawsuit any less enjoyable." - Sterngard Friegen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
Some may remember this website: Phil Berg Let Me Down. Phil basically did the same thing to the woman that owns the website as he did to the woman he was "representing" in 2004 and who brought a complaint to the PA State Bar.

I left the following comment on the above website:

Quote:
I have learned that Phil Berg is undergoing disciplinary actions before the PA State Bar for failure to represent another plaintiff. You can read the PA Bar disciplinary complaint here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49850532/LINC ... 84804-65-3

This document was provided in another case that has little to do with Berg (Berg wants to be a lawyer for the plaintiff but the defendant is trying to block him; it is a bunch of birther non-sense). However, you may find the above document interesting. It may be in your interest and is in the public interest to contact the PA State Bar and let them know more about your experiences with Berg.

While Berg did have a disciplinary hearing on 2/23/11, the Bar is still discussing his punishment. It is not too late for you to share your experience with the PA State Bar.

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
I don't believe there was a hearing on 2/23. AFAIK it was cancelled by the bar.

At least on the papers, it also appears there should probably not be any disciplinary action taken, IMO.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
realist wrote:
I don't believe there was a hearing on 2/23. AFAIK it was cancelled by the bar.

At least on the papers, it also appears there should probably not be any disciplinary action taken, IMO.


Damn! I knew that after I posted my comment I screwed up some of the info.

Was the hearing canceled or rescheduled?

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
LM K wrote:
realist wrote:
I don't believe there was a hearing on 2/23. AFAIK it was cancelled by the bar.

At least on the papers, it also appears there should probably not be any disciplinary action taken, IMO.


Damn! I knew that after I posted my comment I screwed up some of the info.

Was the hearing canceled or rescheduled?


I've not heard of a reschedule, but don't know for certain. It was cancelled for 2/23.

ETA: I thnk it may have been LS that mentioned a rescheduling up thread, but I've neither seen nor heard any confirming info.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
realist wrote:
LM K wrote:
realist wrote:
I don't believe there was a hearing on 2/23. AFAIK it was cancelled by the bar.

At least on the papers, it also appears there should probably not be any disciplinary action taken, IMO.


Damn! I knew that after I posted my comment I screwed up some of the info.

Was the hearing canceled or rescheduled?


I've not heard of a reschedule, but don't know for certain. It was cancelled for 2/23.

ETA: I thnk it may have been LS that mentioned a rescheduling up thread, but I've neither seen nor heard any confirming info.


Thank you, kind sir! ;;)

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:02 pm
Posts: 7372
Location: Moonbat cave
Occupation: Deputy Minister of Propaganda, TP and PC Divisions
I know this isn't about the bar, but...

Berg is a guest on ThomHartmann this morning. He sounds somewhat impaired... and stupid, but that's a given.

I suspect Hartmann is trying to get to the bottom of the birther issue. Why though is he pandering to the nuts? He actually treateD Berg as though he had something important to say! He did bring up the pigeons, though, and conflated his joke about pigeons being robots from the planet Zenu with what Berg and the birthers are saying.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18997
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
kate520 wrote:
I know this isn't about the bar, but...

Berg is a guest on ThomHartmann this morning. He sounds somewhat impaired... and stupid, but that's a given.

I suspect Hartmann is trying to get to the bottom of the birther issue. Why though is he pandering to the nuts? He actually treateD Berg as though he had something important to say! He did bring up the pigeons, though, and conflated his joke about pigeons being robots from the planet Zenu with what Berg and the birthers are saying.





Thom needs a course in Birtherism. :-?

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:07 am
Posts: 104
Berg's Disciplinary Board hearing that was postponed from Feb 23rd to a date in March has now been rescheduled for April 7th. He also appeared once again on Monday trying to get admitted Pro Hac Vice to represent Lincoln and to get the case transferred to another court, but the judge was having none of it.

The judge also denied Lincoln's request for another extension to file an amended complaint against Orly.

_________________
Feminism: the radical notion that women are people, too.
Well behaved women seldom make history!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:19 am
Posts: 3030
Occupation: Bringing Sexy Back
LindainTX wrote:
Berg's Disciplinary Board hearing that was postponed from Feb 23rd to a date in March has now been rescheduled for April 7th. He also appeared once again on Monday trying to get admitted Pro Hac Vice to represent Lincoln and to get the case transferred to another court, but the judge was having none of it.

The judge also denied Lincoln's request for another extension to file an amended complaint against Orly.


The funny thing is that even though Phil was denied his Pro Hac Vice application, he at least attempted to follow through with it which is way more than we can say for Orly Taitz.

Edit: Also, too. Linda, you seem to be posting little tidbits of info about Phil's bad behavior in order to turn us against him. NEWSFLASH: We already are against him for numerous reasons; mainly because he was there in the beginning of this birther batshittery and instigated much of it. We actually want nothing more than to see all sides of the birther bugfuckery lose. Quit trying so hard.

_________________
"Orly has progressed beyond running with scissors. She's taken a 30-minute kerosene bath, and is now juggling lit sparklers." -Mike Dunford

"Holy shit. She's insane. She's bonkers. She's certifiable. She's copulating with a Planters can. She's so fucking batshit that it's going to take at least five generations of bats to replenish global stocks." -Mike Dunford


My hobby: playing conspiracy theories off against each other


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:17 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Lagos Nigeria
Occupation: Lawyer
Highlands wrote:

Edit: Also, too. Linda, you seem to be posting little tidbits of info about Phil's bad behavior in order to turn us against him. NEWSFLASH: We already are against him for numerous reasons; mainly because he was there in the beginning of this birther batshittery and instigated much of it. We actually want nothing more than to see all sides of the birther bugfuckery lose. Quit trying so hard.


I have to say i completely agree with this sentiment :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 8018
Location: HQ Email/Website Hacking Dept, located in the basement of a Liberal-Socialist-Swine Ivory Tower
Occupation: College Instructor; Psychologist
Highlands wrote:

Edit: Also, too. Linda, you seem to be posting little tidbits of info about Phil's bad behavior in order to turn us against him. NEWSFLASH: We already are against him for numerous reasons; mainly because he was there in the beginning of this birther batshittery and instigated much of it. We actually want nothing more than to see all sides of the birther bugfuckery lose. Quit trying so hard.


=)) =)) =)) =D> =D> =D>

Linda demonstrates tremendous neediness in her attempts to further soil Berg. Such actions soil her so much more than they do Berg. Such desperation reveals a possible blackness of character in them both that, leaving anyone with little desire to listen to a word they say.

Rarely does one try so very hard to demonstrate that they are as lacking in character as the one they defame. LSB is succeeding very well in this. =D>

LSB is under the impression that we:

1) need her "insider" info (her Epic Fail on the LisaL probation hearing demonstrated how utterly useless her "insider" info is).

2) are incapable of figuring any of this out for ourselves.

3) believe that her contributions are of any benefit. Well, her comments often make me =)) , so I guess I have to concede that on occasion her contribution has some benefit!

How did we ever take down OC without LSB's help? :lol:

Oh, and LSB is the instigator of birferism. Berg just took the bait. :lol:

_________________
"I have a Ph.D in horribleness."Dr. Horrible of the Evil League of Evil
"The birthers are particularly good at puting two and two together and coming up with aardvark."Pat Gund


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
According to my calendar Berg's disciplinary hearing was scheduled to continue today.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20288
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
realist wrote:
According to my calendar Berg's disciplinary hearing was scheduled to continue today.

Is Orly outside in the hallway of the hearing room?

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:52 am
Posts: 3946
Location: Switzerland
realist wrote:
According to my calendar Berg's disciplinary hearing was scheduled to continue today.

Has any further activity been observed in Berg's case ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 9401
Location: Supreme Court of clerks
Occupation: Petite treason procurer
RTH10260 wrote:
Has any further activity been observed in Berg's case ?

No new activity on the discipline board's site.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image

ASSUME ANYTHING WRITTEN HERE WILL END UP ON TAITZ'S SITE AND FACEBOOK. AND JEROME CORSI WILL POST SCREENSHOTS TO WND. AND WILL BE FILED BY A BIRTHER AS AN EXHIBIT IN FEDERAL COURT. NOW HAVE FUN!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20288
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
I sure hope the Chaleria was there. She has a lot to offer.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
Sterngard Friegen wrote:
I sure hope the Chaleria was there. She has a lot to offer.


I don't know if it's from the PA Bar or not, but I have it on good authority that there is some "activity" re Berg. Waiting on information to be confirmed.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 4221
realist wrote:
I don't know if it's from the PA Bar or not, but I have it on good authority that there is some "activity" re Berg. Waiting on information to be confirmed.

Image

_________________
@Orly: "No one is listening to you anymore. And that’s the way it should always be." - Scott J. Tepper (11/5/2012)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 10764
neonzx wrote:
realist wrote:
I don't know if it's from the PA Bar or not, but I have it on good authority that there is some "activity" re Berg. Waiting on information to be confirmed.

Image


Hee hee.

_________________
"All this talk about blowjobs makes me want to SUE SOMEBODY"-- Sterngard Friegen (quoting Thomas Jefferson)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
neonzx wrote:
realist wrote:
I don't know if it's from the PA Bar or not, but I have it on good authority that there is some "activity" re Berg. Waiting on information to be confirmed.

Image


Small monetarily, but...


Quote:
Shecktor et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al, Docket # 4:09-cv-01570-JEJ (MDPA), June 23, 2011 Order (Document # 63).
Sanctions: [highlight]$1,000 sanctions[/highlight] on plaintiffs for failure to comply with discovery obligations and cautioning plaintiffs that “further violations of this Court’s Orders and/or the Rules of Civil Procedure will result in harsher sanctions.”)


And there is the Holsworth case...

Quote:
Holsworth et al v. Berg et al, Docket # 2:05-cv-01116 (EDPA) June 2, 2005 Order imposing sanctions (Doc # 8), July 26, 2005 Order denying motion for reconsideration (Doc # 12), affirmed, Case No. 05-4033 (3rd Cir., April 17, 2009), mandate issued, May 12, 2009 (Doc. # 60

Sanctions: Among other things, order requiring Berg to pay $10,668.78 to third party defendant against whom frivolous action was filed.

2) Holsworth et al v. Berg et al, Case No. 05-4033 (3rd Cir.), October 15, 2009 Order.

Sanctions: Berg ordered to pay $15,849.00 in attorneys fees under FRAP 38 for filing frivolous appeal.


_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 20288
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Here's a link to the court's Order. The plaintiff (not Berg) is ordered to pay sanctions. But it's clearly a situation where the attorney is the one causing the problems in discovery. And Berg is, indeed, plaintiff's attorney.

Will Berg disclose this case? Who knows? But the Chaleria will. :mrgreen:

(The case is against WalMart for a defective ladder. It was filed in state court, removed to federal court and then transferred to the current judge.)

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 7863
Location: USA
Occupation: Amateur radio host trying to figure out how to lower myself to shameless begging and stupid petition filing. It might be a good way to make a living. ;)
I noticed the Birther Calendar had an entry yesterday for a disciplinary hearing for Phil Berg in PA. Does anyone know if this happened?

_________________
The O-bot prayer:

Grant me the superior wit and biting sarcasm to mock the Birthers whose minds I cannot change
The superior facts, law, and reason to change the minds of the Birthers whom I can
And the wisdom to team up at Politijab The Fogbow with those who share my addiction and know the difference


- Allison 2/16/2009


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: In re Berg (Pa. bar)
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23928
Reality Check wrote:
I noticed the Birther Calendar had an entry yesterday for a disciplinary hearing for Phil Berg in PA. Does anyone know if this happened?


There's no entry indicating it was cancelled nor rescheduled, as there was with at least one of the past hearings, so I would presume it did.

Quote:
208 DB 2010 10/18/2010

PETITION FOR DISCIPLINE FILED


208 DB 2010 12/13/2010

ANSWER TO PETITION FOR DISCIPLINE FILED
BY RESPONDENT

208 DB 2010 12/17/2010

HEARING SCHEDULED
(02/23/2011), 09:30 AM DISTRICT II

208 DB 2010 12/17/2010
PETITION REFERRED TO HEARING COMMITTEE

BARRETT, MALLON, SANTARELLI
208 DB 2010 03/02/2011

HEARING RESCHEDULED
(04/07/2011), 09:30 AM, DISTRICT II

208 DB 2010 05/06/2011

HEARING CONTINUED
(05/25/2011), 09:30 AM, DISTRICT II

208 DB 2010 08/24/2011

POST- HEARING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED
(09/19/2011), 02:00 PM, DISTRICT II

208 DB 2010 10/27/2011

ADDITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED
(11/23/2011), 09:30 AM, DISTRICT II

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


Image x 3 Image x 21


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group