xxx-http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=18290

According to the Disciplinary Board of SCOPA, Berg has a hearing on Feb. 23.

Gotta call bullshit on that one, Oily. According to the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (the folks who are in charge of attorney discipline in the state of Pennsylvania):


But, sure, Oily...you should definitely go to Pennsylvania for the hearing, even though--unless you were the complainant and called as a witness by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel--you won't get in. And you DEFINITELY should encourage your foolish "supporters" to spend their money for travel/lodging to/in Pennsylvania to appear as "witnesses" at a hearing which they cannot even attend, much less testify. Of course, that's money that they might have just sent directly to you to help pay for those sanctions, but what the heck...it's really better to make a fools out of yourself and them, on a nice February day in Pennsylvania.

I tried earlier to post at Orly's to pick her up on the hearing being public but I don't think it got through - her website was playing up at the time. Not that I mind I'm just as happy watching her make a bigger fool of herself.

She is not the complainant and it has nothing to do with the case filed against her and the other defendants.

We suspected as much when it first came up.

She's an idiot, and she knows it has nothing to do with her, but it makes her look good to her flying monkeys... she's not going and she knows no one else is either... it's all for show.

Although it would be great if 10 of her minions showed up and were turned away with a statement they have no idea who Orly Taitz is nor why she told them to appear.

oh, another satisfied client.

Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.

It would certainly be more efficient and reality-based. Plus, it could be a money-maker for Berg...like a car dealer with their "prep fee," Berg could charge a non-refundable, upfront, bar complaint form fee (the "deluxe" fee if Berg also furnishes the proper Pennsylvania district address for filing it).

Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.


Berg should include a bar complaint form with his standard engagement letter.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:59 am

Ah res, we agree 1000%. I know what he's in trouble for and it has nothing to do with the lawsuit, or any of us. It has to do with a complaint involving his former paralegal Marie and his bad habits. Unfortunately for him, when his current paralegal was gossiping to me about his scandals and peccadillos, she blabbed his dirty little secrets to me. I seriously doubt his client who posts here was told the real reason he is getting hauled before the Disciplinary Board. I'd be very worried if he were representing me. She doesn't seem to comprehend what may be about to happen regarding her own liability; for making numerous false sworn affidavits, not to mention implication in some questionable fundraising.

Did anyone else notice that he and felon paralegal are pointing at each other as to who prepared various statements? She sued her lawyer in CA along with God and everyone; and she lost. I have to wonder how long before they turn on her? They are going to say that they simply included what she told them. Even the other plaintiff said she never accused anyone of planning to kidnap her children - that was the invention of him and/or his felon paralegal. Tsk, tsk. I'd be very worried if I were one of his clients.

LindainTX - what's the basis for the current disciplline against Berg, then?

And while you're answering Mr. Friegen, would you like to give us your thoughts LindainTX regarding this notation in the San Bernardino Court records for Lisa Liberi?



I suspect that neither Berg nor Taitz have any idea just how much trouble they both may be in, even though they have been warned repeatedly by Federal judges all across our great land.

I don't know anything about this at all. Exactly where was this psoted? Do you have a url?

I interpret this as a statement that shared that info with the PA board.



Oh please. Berg's actions are his own. If you are referring to Lisa L as the client who should be worried, you are wrong. She isn't licensed for anything in PA. Berg is being disciplined for his actions and/or for allowing actions to happen in his name without proper supervision.



Again, revenge trumps over logic.

I can see that you have stayed busy, Linda. You keep pointing out that Berg did unethical things and that those linked to him could face consequences. But weren't you linked to him for over 10 years, working very closely with him from July/Aug 2008 through March, 2009?

No I didn't work closely with him for over 10 years. I said we knew each other and I once considered us friends. We didn't talk for a couple of years prior to Jan 2008. He was a Hillary supporter and I was an Edwards supporter who turned to Hillary. I did help him with some projects over the years, including writing a couple of speeches for him when he ran for office, but our closest association was in fighting against the Impeachment and removal of Clinton. It's not that we were on the outs as much as we were doing other things in our own lives. We did talk a lot, every day, between 1998 and 2002, but it slowed way, way down after 2002. We did talk quite a bit in 2004 due to my becoming a hot topic in msm. One jerk reporter investigated me for the NY Times trying to prove I was a different person with a past, but he couldn't find anything on me to report. And believe me, they were desperately trying everything to get me to talk to them or to prove that I was another person. Which Berg knew because he wanted to represent me on tv as my legal spokesperson.

It would all be funny except some unidentified female called neighbors and told their kids who go to school with my son a bunch of crap about me and it went through the school causing my son an enormous amount of grief. All it did was hurt my sweet and innocent MINOR son by making him a target for bullying, harassment and even assaults at school.

There are all kinds of consequences: legal, financial, or criminal. People are responsible for things they do. There are multiple plaintiffs and I phrased my comment in such a way as to not identify anyone. I just know that things I and the other defendants have been accused of doing, have actually been done TO some or all of us and/or our families and someone is going to answer for it. And I believe Berg won't be available.

And yet, you associate yourself with Orly Taitz who is anathema to all your professed values.

What am I missing?

Hip waders, I suspect. It's pretty deep, methinks.

Since I came late to the birther party and am not aware of your background, could you (or someone) elaborate on this, please? I'm just trying to understand what all is going on here...

Birther persecution complex.

For a bunch of paranoid simple-minded nitwits NOT to turn on one another would be the shocker.

What choice did I have as co-defendants in an $800 million suit? I felt a responsiblity to tell the truth. Other than over this lawsuit, Orly & I really do not talk.

Why do you really think Res helped Orly at that hearing or escorted her to get some dinner? He took a lot of heat for his actions. He thought it was the right thing to do as a PA lawyer embarassed by Berg's conduct and as a gentleman not to send a woman out alone on a dark street in a large unfamiliar city with a high crime rate. Plaintiffs have lied throughtout ALL the pleadings. Not one of them has clean hands. Not one. I couldn't stay silent knowing the truth. I couldn't turn my back and let the other defendants twist in the wind with all the lies. It certainly would have been smarter.

Are you familiar with the story of Julie Hiatt Steele? It would have been much smarter of her to let Clinton twist in the wind when the GOP and Ken Starr were after him. She knew Kathleen Willey lied about Clinton groping her in the Oval Office. KW is posting right wing pieces on WND now and we got into it.

Ken Starr had an indictment written and prepared to take BC out of the Oval Office. His papers only needed a date. He offered JHS a deal if she would have a "new memory" that allowed his removal. Instead, she went public and told the truth and it cost her everything she had in this world. We became good friends after her trial was over in 1999.

Res, it isn't birther paranoia anymore than it was Dem paranoia when we warned people what 43 would do when he was sworn in. We warned they would be illegally wiretapping all our phones, which was later proven we were right. But keep on with the insults.

Again, I ask the question:

Who gives a crap what a bunch of nuts on the Internet say about you? Thousands of Obama-Haters say the most horrific things about the President and his family on the Internet every day, and guess what? He doesn't care, because, again, who gives a crap what a bunch of nuts on the Internet say about you?

As far as the lawsuit goes:

a. IANAL, but the first thing I would have done is to hire a competent lawyer. Instead, you have Orly Taitz, the worst lawyer in the world.

b. I'm pretty sure that none of you had a reputation to besmirch in the first place, so I'm not sure what the damages would be for sullying your good name.

c. Are you really comparing this nonsense to the Clinton impeachment? Really? Please! You need to get over yourself.

In the first draft it was probably the Crucifixion.

Agreed, hiring a competent lawyer would be job one, except that costs money some people might not have.

But it is my understanding that the world's worst lawyer does not represent LBS. LBS is on her own. While she is not accomplishing anything on her own behalf, at least she is not risking the further humiliation and possible monetary sanctions that Orly's fine lawyering skills bring into play.

<Wiping laugh tears off my face, and morning caffeine off my monitor>

Ah, thank you, Stern!

Betting pool now open:

Lacking the sekrit knowledge about these proceedings, nonetheless I predict: Actual suspension for 2-6 months.