Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]     
Author Message
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:18 am
Posts: 192
I was over at RSOL and read that Berg had once submitted a Canadian bc signed by Dudley Doright, (thank the Lord I swallowed the coffee before I got to that line)....he didn't really, did he ? ok, I'm gullible, but it's Phil Berg .......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 23562
Jill Christie wrote:
I was over at RSOL and read that Berg had once submitted a Canadian bc signed by Dudley Doright, (thank the Lord I swallowed the coffee before I got to that line)....he didn't really, did he ? ok, I'm gullible, but it's Phil Berg .......


Yes, he did, in his original case, Berg v Obama.

_________________
Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.
John Adams


ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 6407
Location: Edmonds, WA
Jill Christie wrote:
I was over at RSOL and read that Berg had once submitted a Canadian bc signed by Dudley Doright, (thank the Lord I swallowed the coffee before I got to that line)....he didn't really, did he ? ok, I'm gullible, but it's Phil Berg .......


He did indeed. His original case, Berg v Obama, he made reference to a Canadian Birth Certificate floating around the internet. This one here

http://www.rense.com/general82/pbb.htm

Image

It was signed by Dudley DoRight and JFK. Go figure.

Berg was at that time scooping up any claim floating around PUMA boards like No Quarter and TexasDarlin, and also cited both Polarik AND TechDude, at a time that TechDude had been discredited on said PUMA boards. So it's not surprising he scooped this one up without looking at the evidence for this either. After all, it's not like he bothered looking at the evidence for any other claim now, is it?

_________________
Bad Fiction - The Intersection of Bad Movies and Worse Politics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:01 am
Posts: 18583
Location: Planet Earth (most the time)
Occupation: I'm not at liberty to say. In other words, I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
Image


Image
Image

Image

_________________
Yes We Can! ~ Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:18 am
Posts: 192
thanks...... I should have known.....I think some lawyer should go after these frauds..... an issue should be made over the frivolous spending of our tax money being wasted on these suits. Courtrooms, judges,clerks and security cost money.... time to disbar these frauds. Does the ABA have a clue?!!!!!! What are they waiting for ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:32 am
Posts: 19964
Location: FEMA Camp 17 -- Malibu (Hey! You! Get off the lawn!)
Occupation: Schadenfreude artist.
Jill Christie wrote:
thanks...... I should have known.....I think some lawyer should go after these frauds..... an issue should be made over the frivolous spending of our tax money being wasted on these suits. Courtrooms, judges,clerks and security cost money.... time to disbar these frauds. Does the ABA* have a clue?!!!!!! What are they waiting for ?

The mills of god grind slowly, but they grind exceeding fine.



* The ABA is a national trade and lobbying orgnization that has nothing to do with licensing lawyers.

_________________
When there are a finite number of ways to screw something up, Orly Taitz will find an infinite number of ways to do so. (The Sternsig Rule.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:32 pm
Posts: 353
Jill Christie wrote:
I was over at RSOL and read that Berg had once submitted a Canadian bc signed by Dudley Doright, (thank the Lord I swallowed the coffee before I got to that line)....he didn't really, did he ? ok, I'm gullible, but it's Phil Berg .......

Berg cited the Canadian BC, presumably unseen, based on then-recent internet birther blather. It was soon revealed to be the Dudley Doright special. This was signed August 21, 2008.


_________________
"I demand the commander in chief be stripped of command." - Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III, 2/5/2007.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:40 am
Posts: 2740
Location: Halfway to Paradise
Occupation: digital artist, domestic goddess, mother, patriot
PatGund wrote:
He did indeed. His original case, Berg v Obama, he made reference to a Canadian Birth Certificate floating around the internet. This one here

That's the first time I've ever actually seen that one. Why hasn't anyone ever mentioned that it also says "BR549" on it? That's gotta be a reference to these guys. I've been listening to them for years.

Phil Berg is really stoopid.

_________________
Seeking to determine the authenticity of a document by looking at a pixellated photo of the document proves nothing except the stupidity of the person doing so. ~Sterngard Friegen

Hate is universal, but it rarely survives a good bitch-slapping. ~Estiveo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:01 am
Posts: 735
Occupation: Adverb specialist in the French Ministry of Language Purity
Lola_Getz wrote:
PatGund wrote:
He did indeed. His original case, Berg v Obama, he made reference to a Canadian Birth Certificate floating around the internet. This one here

That's the first time I've ever actually seen that one. Why hasn't anyone ever mentioned that it also says "BR549" on it? That's gotta be a reference to these guys. I've been listening to them for years.

Phil Berg is really stoopid.



Could be based on those guys, but those guys took the name from a long running gag on "Hee Haw" done by Junior Samples: "his most famous bit was as a used car salesman, inviting callers to call an older 5-digit phone number, BR-549 "


_________________
I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

ImageImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:36 am
Posts: 5187
Location: Belize City
Occupation: Visiting doctors.
Isn't Hee Haw on the internets one of the signs of the Apocalypse? That was surreal.

_________________
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum. -- Stonekettle Station
ImageImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A Sunday Funny
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:20 pm
Posts: 3897
I'm still torn as to whether Berg citing the Doright BC is better or worse than the source he claims in Paragraph 26:

"Additionally, there is rumor circulating on the Internet that his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted Obama"

A fake document, even a silly fake document, could still be considered to be one step above admitted "rumor." And barely outpacing "rumor" is his source in Paragraph 19: "references circulating on the internet."

_________________
"In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms."
- Stephen Jay Gould

Barackryphal


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]     

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
View new posts | View active topics



Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group