For those who would like their daily dose of crazy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k1tXh6meEg

Skip ahead to 12:25, and listen as he tells us what the movie really means.

When I came across this on one of the nutz sites that I visit, I had no idea that there was so much out there about this film. It is denounced as Illuminati programming of the masses, praised as revealing the dark secrets of the Illuminati, and heralded as the announcement of a major calamity soon to come. The author/director does seem to have worked almost every possible bit of Illuminati symbolism into the film, along with 9/11 conspiracy theories and Antichrist theories about President Obama. It fits that the director worked on the Golem character, which was truly creepy.

Some of the comments on Jones' site say that the director is on "the good side" while others basically declare that he is a tool of Satan. Others claim that he cannot be the director because he understands so little of this film. How he was able to work "full-time" for five years on the film is a bit mysterious to me. Residual income from his previous films must be fantastic.

I wonder who the target audience is. I think those who have taken Zeitgeist as the truth may be that audience.

“I asked what kind of protective gear I was going to have, and they said ‘nothing,’” Yoshitake said laughing. “I had a baseball cap with me, and I said ‘I better wear that just in case.’”

Today, 55 years later, the seemingly safe operation may have had some serious side effects: all six members of the group have had cancer, with four dying of it, according to Yoshitake and Luttrell.

“In those days, nobody thought there could be any fear of developing cancer from these nuclear tests,” said Yoshitake who survived stomach cancer. “But … there must be some direct correlation between these tests and cancer.” Yoshitake noted that many of his “camera friends” who filmed similar operations developed and died of cancer; most in their 40s and 50s.

“In hindsight … it appears that it was not safe,” colon-cancer survivor Lutrell said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/07/ ... z22UdrRphX

That is so creepy wrong.

My mum forwarded this. Pretty good laugh.

I give the Tech a B+. When the user complained about slower access versus the scroll, the tech should have taken that as a clue to show the usage of "bookmarks".

Although, when I think about it, it is possible that the tech has had prior experience with the user and realized that explaining the differences between "page-based random access" versus "serial access" would have to wait for another day.

Okay, in my search for a cat herding video to post in the separation of church and state thread, I found this and nearly peed myself laughing.

Best political ad evar!

That's cool, Foogy. Maybe a bit scary too.

Synchronicity through propinquity.

Seldom has peer pressure been depicted so starkly.

Now maybe as the synchronicity built up, the platform started to sway in sequence with the metronomes. Or maybe the platform swaying preceded the other with some help outside camera view?

Resistance is futile.

Wow, it sure is dusty in here today...

MadTV, uploaded 9 May 2006.

Sound familar??

Do we have this one yet?